Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #1038Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-)
From: jma... Joseph T. Malloy
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 1995 00:00
28 lines
1710 bytes
1710 bytes
In article <kremeDB...@netcom.com> kr...@netcom.com (Cerebus The Aardvark) writes: >jco...@socketis.net (Jody Cooper) writes: > >>In article <3u4s8a$5...@lynx.unm.edu>, >> deh...@capella.unm.edu (Dan Ehrig) wrote: >>>Jody Cooper (jco...@socketis.net) wrote: >>> >>>: Hmmm. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought Warp was supposed to have >>>: support for Win32s. >>> >>>It did. For Win32s 1.15. So, after Warp's release, MS changed it so >>>that it was incompatible. Accidentally of course. > >>Ahh. Kind of like the Windows 3.11 "refresh" files that did nothing more but >>prevent people from using the then just-release OS/2 for Windows. <G!> > >And people continue to do business with Microsquish, it's amazing. Here is >a company practiving the melectronic equiv of "ethnic cleansing" and people >continue to throw money at them. Here's a hint: If you continue to support >microsoft, they will continue to screw you at every opportunity. I've "supported" Microsoft by buying their software, though hardly exclusively, and they have yet to "screw" me. > >My Hard drive is Micro-soft free, is yours? Nope. Wouldn't have it any other way.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3ueuag$5aj@itsmail1.hamilton.edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: jma...@itsmail1.hamilton.edu (Joseph T. Malloy) Subject: Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-) Date: 1995/07/17 Message-ID: <3ueuag$5aj@itsmail1.hamilton.edu> X-Deja-AN: 106423542 organization: Hamilton College newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit