Re: Command & Conquer sent to Duplication? Really?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #5250

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#5250

From: mist... misterfx
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 00:00

20 lines
1034 bytes

murpes, the Avatar. (JDCA...@vax1.acs.jmu.edu) wrote:
: In <42nadi$9...@gryphon.phoenix.net> g...@phoenix.net writes:

: >      Has anyone else heard this?!   I'm reluctant to believe it though
: > it would be nice....
: > 


: Yes, I believe this to be true, too.  I work for a (actually, *THE*) major
: software chain, and we recieved information that it went into duplication
: Sept.4.  I'm hoping the anticipated release date might actually be a bit
: sooner.

: murpes

: (NOT speaking for my employer).

The latest rumor is that it will be in stores tommorw!

I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <439hdu$83n@parsifal.nando.net>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <42nadi$9ft@gryphon.phoenix.net> <437l1j$85q@doc.jmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: mist...@nando.net (misterfx)
Subject: Re: Command & Conquer sent to Duplication?  Really?
Date: 1995/09/14
Message-ID: <439hdu$83n@parsifal.nando.net>
X-Deja-AN: 110121587
references: <42nadi$9ft@gryphon.phoenix.net> <437l1j$85q@doc.jmu.edu>
organization: NandO.net
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message