Re: Command & Conquer sent to Duplication? Really?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #5251

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#5251

From: re... Marco Yu Chai Lee
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1995 00:00

28 lines
1267 bytes

In article <439hdu$8...@parsifal.nando.net>, misterfx@nando.netm says...
>
>murpes, the Avatar. (JDCA...@vax1.acs.jmu.edu) wrote:
>: In <42nadi$9...@gryphon.phoenix.net> g...@phoenix.net writes:
>
>: >      Has anyone else heard this?!   I'm reluctant to believe it 
though
>: > it would be nice....
>: > 
>
>
>: Yes, I believe this to be true, too.  I work for a (actually, *THE*) 
major
>: software chain, and we recieved information that it went into 
duplication
>: Sept.4.  I'm hoping the anticipated release date might actually be a 
bit
>: sooner.
>
>: murpes
>
>: (NOT speaking for my employer).
>
>The latest rumor is that it will be in stores tommorw!
>
>I'm keeping my fingers crossed.

tomorrow?!! i thought it's 17th..

Technical Details

Message-ID: <439o08$bui@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <42nadi$9ft@gryphon.phoenix.net> <437l1j$85q@doc.jmu.edu> <439hdu$83n@parsifal.nando.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: re...@isr1067.urh.uiuc.edu (Marco Yu Chai Lee)
Subject: Re: Command & Conquer sent to Duplication?  Really?
Date: 1995/09/14
Message-ID: <439o08$bui@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 110121598
references: <42nadi$9ft@gryphon.phoenix.net> <437l1j$85q@doc.jmu.edu> <439hdu$83n@parsifal.nando.net>
organization: Merkel Enterprise!
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: yc...@prairienet.org
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message