🚀 go-pugleaf

In <3sj9kt$c...@lynx.unm.edu> deh...@pegasus.unm.edu (Dan Ehrig) writes:

>
>JORDAN  SPENSER AARON (jord...@benji.Colorado.EDU) wrote:
>
>
>: I agree, the OStwo zealots clammor about how customizable their OS
is, 
>: but it still looks like shit.  Windows 95 could be completely 
>
>You claim to have never used OS/2, but also claim it looks like shit? 

>You have led us to a multiple choice test:
>
>A.  You're Stupid.
>B.  You're Lying.
>C.  You can't remember if you've used OS/2.
>D.  You can't remember if you're stupid and lying.
>E.  All of the above.
>
>I choose E.
>
>: uncustomizable and it would still destroy OStwo.  Yes, Microsoft has

>: their act together and the OStwo zealots are scurring about like
Sadam 
>: Hussein spreading untrue propoganda to try to fool us into using
their 
>: OS.  Well they are the fools.
>
>Who's the fool, he who tests all the options and chooses the best one,
or he 
>who blindly commits to using an 'OS' (note that WinXX is not really an
OS, 
>as it is, once again, a shell on top of Dos) without checking out the 
>competition?
>
>Note:  As if trying to prove my point, MS is including memmaker.exe
with 
>the release of Win9X.  
>
>-Dan
>
>--
>My inner child is a mean little fucker.
>http://www.unm.edu/~dehrig/dan3.html

I say that both have FUCKING lost it!!!  Everyone know that OS/2 will
and can KICK THE SHIT OUT OF WINDOWS AND DAY, MONTH, OR YEARS TO COME. 
When Windows decides to make sure that they come close to what OS/2 has
to offer. (THEN THEY CAN COMPETE IN THAT RACE) But not before!!! I
don't care when it comes out!!

Big_...@ix.netcom.com