🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3skhek$e...@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
           big_...@ix.netcom.com "Big_Bear " writes:

> In <3sj9kt$c...@lynx.unm.edu> deh...@pegasus.unm.edu (Dan Ehrig) writes:
> 
> >
> >JORDAN  SPENSER AARON (jord...@benji.Colorado.EDU) wrote:
> >
> >
> >: I agree, the OStwo zealots clammor about how customizable their OS
> is, 
> >: but it still looks like shit.  Windows 95 could be completely 
> >
> >You claim to have never used OS/2, but also claim it looks like shit? 
> 
> >You have led us to a multiple choice test:
> >
> >A.  You're Stupid.
> >B.  You're Lying.
> >C.  You can't remember if you've used OS/2.
> >D.  You can't remember if you're stupid and lying.
> >E.  All of the above.
> >
> >I choose E.
> >
> >: uncustomizable and it would still destroy OStwo.  Yes, Microsoft has
> 
> >: their act together and the OStwo zealots are scurring about like
> Sadam 
> >: Hussein spreading untrue propoganda to try to fool us into using
> their 
> >: OS.  Well they are the fools.
> >
> >Who's the fool, he who tests all the options and chooses the best one,
> or he 
> >who blindly commits to using an 'OS' (note that WinXX is not really an
> OS, 
> >as it is, once again, a shell on top of Dos) without checking out the 
> >competition?
> >
> >Note:  As if trying to prove my point, MS is including memmaker.exe
> with 
> >the release of Win9X.  
> >
> >-Dan
> >
> >--
> >My inner child is a mean little fucker.
> >http://www.unm.edu/~dehrig/dan3.html
> 
> I say that both have FUCKING lost it!!!  Everyone know that OS/2 will
> and can KICK THE SHIT OUT OF WINDOWS AND DAY, MONTH, OR YEARS TO COME. 
> When Windows decides to make sure that they come close to what OS/2 has
> to offer. (THEN THEY CAN COMPETE IN THAT RACE) But not before!!! I
> don't care when it comes out!!
> 
> Big_...@ix.netcom.com
> 
> 

Not like windows then ? I had a go at os but when it got a shit on with my
cd drive I got rid. At least windows works on my system well some of the
time !
-- 
Nomis