Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #6503Re: The dim future of PC gaming.
From: nobody
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:00
29 lines
1697 bytes
1697 bytes
jso...@marcam.com (Jeff Somers) wrote: >In article <43qam8$p...@pellew.ntu.edu.au>, nobody <nob...@csufresno.edu> writes: >[cut] >|> >|> Intel P6, AMD K5, and NexGen 586 are all RISC processors emulating >|> X86.(hell, you can even feed them their native RISC instuctions and >|> bypass X86 instructions entirely). Only Cyrix's M1 is the true X86 >|> processor with CISC core. >[cut] > >Not true, the P6 won't allow you to do that. (Forget where I read this; >probably either Byte or PC Mag.) I can see why, too, it would force >Intel to be backwards compatible with another instruction set. It >would be difficult for them tweak their "risc instruction set" for the >P7 and beyond if everyone was bypassing the 386 instruction set. It is possible to feed P6, K5, and Nx586 with their native RISC instructions, but Intel will not document the P6 RISC instructions, since that was for internal testing purpose only(There are lots of stuffs in X86 architectures that intel won't document, like extra resisters and instructions). Beside, nobody is going to write the applications in X86 emulators' native instructions, since that would limit the market severely. > >jeff s. >jso...@marcam.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1995Sep21.223851.2800@titan.sfasu.edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<1995Sep19.150027.2764@titan.sfasu.edu> <43nnup$biv@steel.interlog.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: nobody <nob...@csufresno.edu> Subject: Re: The dim future of PC gaming. Date: 1995/09/21 Message-ID: <1995Sep21.223851.2800@titan.sfasu.edu> X-Deja-AN: 110565135 references: <1995Sep19.150027.2764@titan.sfasu.edu> <43nnup$biv@steel.interlog.com> mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action x-mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Windows; I; 16bit) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit