Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-)

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #949

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#949

From: may... Robert L Maynard
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 1995 00:00

15 lines
1136 bytes

In article <KNFCwIxW...@xs4all.nl>,
Wim Verveen <wver...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>In article <3u6vbg$r...@selway.umt.edu>,
>may...@selway.umt.edu (Robert L Maynard) wrote:
>> In a recent InfoWorld a columnist quoted Steve Ballmer, #2 at MS, as saying
>> that ( in Ballmers' opinion ) PC os's were as follows :
>> NT > OS/2 > W95 > WfWg > W 3.1
>> 
>> Bob
>In wich perspective? In this case I suspect stability or multitasking
>

Stability.  Should have made that clear.

Bob

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3uf2hd$jt7@selway.umt.edu>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <DBGvB9.58o@iglou.com> <3u6vbg$r68@selway.umt.edu> <KNFCwIxWc7zP083yn@xs4all.nl>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: may...@selway.umt.edu (Robert L Maynard)
Subject: Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-)
Date: 1995/07/17
Message-ID: <3uf2hd$jt7@selway.umt.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 106423534
references: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <DBGvB9.58o@iglou.com> <3u6vbg$r68@selway.umt.edu> <KNFCwIxWc7zP083yn@xs4all.nl>
organization: University of Montana, Missoula
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message