Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-)

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #948

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#948

From: wver... Wim Verveen
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 00:00

13 lines
1231 bytes

In article <3u6vbg$r...@selway.umt.edu>,
may...@selway.umt.edu (Robert L Maynard) wrote:
> In a recent InfoWorld a columnist quoted Steve Ballmer, #2 at MS, as saying
> that ( in Ballmers' opinion ) PC os's were as follows :
> NT > OS/2 > W95 > WfWg > W 3.1
> 
> Bob
In wich perspective? In this case I suspect stability or multitasking

Wim Verveen (wver...@xs4all.nl)      | Generals are in the nice white tent
                                      | on the hill, sipping sancerre
                                      | directing the battle; They are
 http://www.xs4all.nl/~wverveen/      | men of honour             Rimmer

Technical Details

Message-ID: <KNFCwIxWc7zP083yn@xs4all.nl>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3tg4mr$hia@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: wver...@xs4all.nl (Wim Verveen)
Subject: Re: Windows 95 & Microsoft (vs OS/2?) : long but IMHO good! :-)
Date: 1995/07/15
Message-ID: <KNFCwIxWc7zP083yn@xs4all.nl>
X-Deja-AN: 106329622
references: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3tg4mr$hia@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>
organization: XS4ALL, the Netherlands
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message