Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #6596Re: Intel names P6 "Pentium Pro", not "Pentium2"
From: mcar... Michael Carmack
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:00
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 00:00
17 lines
1339 bytes
1339 bytes
nobody (nob...@csufresno.edu) wrote:
[Explanation of sluggish P6 performace when running 16-bit apps snipped...]
: This is not a good news for PC gamers, since P6 will not improve the
: excution speed of DOS and Windows95 games over similarly clocked P5.
On the contrary, I think it's very good news. Maybe we (the consumers)
will be able to enjoy our new systems for more than a year before rising
game requirements force us to upgrade yet again! I just got my P-133
yesterday and if I need a chip upgrade in less than three years, someone
in the gaming industry is going to pay!!! 8-D
--
========================================================================
"In sports, it's not who wins or loses; | Mike Carmack
it's how drunk you get." | mcarmack@freenet.
- Homer Simpson | columbus.oh.us
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<43rop5$6b3@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<1995Sep20.172827.2783@titan.sfasu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: mcar...@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Michael Carmack) Subject: Re: Intel names P6 "Pentium Pro", not "Pentium2" Date: 1995/09/21 Message-ID: <43rop5$6b3@acme.freenet.columbus.oh.us> X-Deja-AN: 110627311 references: <1995Sep20.172827.2783@titan.sfasu.edu> organization: The Greater Columbus FreeNet newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit