Re: How does Earthsiege compare to MW2?

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

Article #4809

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Previous Next

#4809

From: grif... Griffith Everson
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 1995 00:00

12 lines
1053 bytes

In article <PASTORARF...@cadetmail.usafa.af.mil> PASTORAR...@cadetmail.usafa.af.mil (REINALDO F. PASTORA) writes:
>From: PASTORAR...@cadetmail.usafa.af.mil (REINALDO F. PASTORA)
>Subject: How does Earthsiege compare to MW2?
>Date: Mon, 28 Aug 1995 02:29:35 GMT

>It looks like a good buy.  I have MW2 and like it, but I was wondering if 
>Earthsiege was any good?

It's like comparing Wolfenstein 3D to Doom II,  EarthSeige at the time was
great but it fails miserably compared to MW2.  It's a _much_ slower engine
and the control leaves little to be desired.  Unless you're talking fire sale,
I'd steer clear.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <griffith.133.000B6B41@interport.net>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <PASTORARF96%CS30.43@cadetmail.usafa.af.mil>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: grif...@interport.net (Griffith Everson)
Subject: Re: How does Earthsiege compare to MW2?
Date: 1995/08/27
Message-ID: <griffith.133.000B6B41@interport.net>
X-Deja-AN: 108938893
references: <PASTORARF96%CS30.43@cadetmail.usafa.af.mil>
organization: Interport Communications Corp.
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message