🚀 go-pugleaf

On 22 Apr 1995, root wrote:

> Rude?  WTF, you asked a really, really dumb question on the usenet, and you 
> got flamed for it.  Who honestly gives a damn whether the "files=" can be 
> specified for each DOS session, and if so what relevence does it have to the 
> gaming groups?  NONE.  Dumb, dumb dumb dumb.  Then, you insist on continuing 

I disagree -- it is directly related to all these gaming groups, since so 
many games demand such a wide variety of configurations.  I wanted to 
know if Win95 performed as well as OS/2 in handling such a scenario.  The 
quality of the answer, IMHO, has direct bearing on the quality of both of 
these operating systems as gaming platforms. 

> the stupidity by posting as though you were some righteous avatar, when in 
> fact you are a schmuck who posted an irrelevent (who cares about a handfull 
> of bytes that the "files=" might take up?) question to the incorrect 
> newsgroups. 

Obviously you are having trouble extrapolating from my FILES= example to 
other -- more important -- configuration settings, such as the ability to 
manipulate system memory, selectively load device drivers, etc.  Not all 
of us are as challenged in our critical thinking abilities.

JOHN

* John M. Martz:  Psychology Dept, UNC-CH  *                            *
|                 CB# 3270, Davie Hall     | B = f(P,E)                 |
|                 Chapel Hill, NC 27599    |          --Kurt Lewin      |
*                 JOHN_...@UNC.EDU       *                            *