🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Article #1697

Re: Windows 95 & OS/2

#1697
From: jord... JORDAN SPENSER AARON
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 00:00
53 lines
2848 bytes
>The big difference would be for heavy-duty strategy/tactics games, such as
>wargames, historically accurate or not, galactic conmquest games...   Also 
>any other game with a fancy computer opponent (air combat simulators).  These
>games all need a pretty good computer opponent if the games are to be 
>replayable.  In a single-threaded OS, the computer only starts playing when
>-you- are done, and you get to stare at the screen.  The better AI's, of
>course, take the most time.
>
>In a multitasking OS, the computer opponent can busy himself thinking his 
>next move while the human player is still staring at information screens
>and clicking left and right.  So, when the human is done, the AI is almost 
>done, too...   Resulting in faster, less frustrating play and potentially
>'better' AI's (they have more time to 'think').
>
>--

Heres a scenario:

OS/2 zealot #1: Hey friend, lets computer play a game together?

OS/2 zealot #2: OK, what should we play? 

zealot #1: Well, lets see.  The only game thats OS/2 native is Galactic 
           Civilizations.  But you know, it takes advantage of that cool 
           multithreading technology that we love so much about our 
           beloved operating system.

zealot #2: Yeah, BC has great technology under the engine.  Man that AI 
           really screams.  But in't it a solitaire game?

#1: Oh yeah, right.

#2: So much for that cool multithreading thing.  We can't do anything 
    usefull with it against each other.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heres another scenario:

DOS/Windows 95 gamer #1: Hey friend let play a computer game together?

DOS/Windows 95 gamer #2: OK, what should we play?

gamer #1: Well, theres so much to choose from.  How about that new 
          Mech Warrior 2 network demo?

gamer #2: Oh, yeah.  Can't wait for the Windows 95 specific version due 
          out soon.
-- 
_____________________________________________________________________________
                    __________    No matter where you go,
                   /  ______  \       there you are.
                  |  |      |  |        
Technical Details
Message-ID: <403vlh$la2@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3vf0uj$nnt@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <26NGDy$030@cdale1.midwest.net> <3vmaqt$5a6@homer.cs.mcgill.ca>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: jord...@benji.Colorado.EDU (JORDAN  SPENSER AARON)
Subject: Re: Windows 95 & OS/2
Date: 1995/08/07
Message-ID: <403vlh$la2@CUBoulder.Colorado.EDU>
X-Deja-AN: 107623806
references: <3t91i2$3gt@oslo-nntp.eunet.no> <3vf0uj$nnt@ixnews5.ix.netcom.com> <26NGDy$030@cdale1.midwest.net> <3vmaqt$5a6@homer.cs.mcgill.ca>
organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit