Thread View: alt.games.warcraft
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by bur... burnout
Mon, 08 Jan 1996 00:00
WarCraft 3 Suggestions
Author: bur... burnout
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 00:00
4 lines
550 bytes
550 bytes
WarCraft2 is a good enough game as it is. Any further advancements in a WarCraft3 would just spoil it. They technology should not be too advanced, and should focus more on brute strength and magic then technological advances.
Re: WarCraft 3 Suggestions
Author: ca... Casey Charlton
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 00:00
39 lines
2030 bytes
2030 bytes
All good examples. The ones that you missed that really annoy me: You have a group of assembled units waiting to be sent somewhere (as they mass for an attack for example). An enemy catapult trundles up an fires at your troops, killing half before they decide to react. Then half react, and attack the catapult, the others stand around looking stupid. (same happens with boats). This commonly leads to problem two. A group of your units attacks an advancing unit, by moving out to meet it. It gets scared, and runs away, back to the safety of it's base. Your units stupidly follow it, straight into guard towers and massed units, and promptly get destroyed. The most important thing to put into WC2 / 3 is the C&C style grouping commands, so that you can allocate groups to keys. It would make it practical to use mages. Currently it is impossible in a fight to select individual units and cast spells. It would also make it possible to coordinate your units (9 paladins in a group, 9 mages, 9 rangers, it would be very quick to send in waves of attackers). On 9 Jan 1996 23:40:51 GMT, sc...@ccat.sas.upenn.edu (Samuel Choi) wrote: >In article <4cs0c2$8...@sundog.tiac.net> bur...@tiac.net (burnout) writes: >>WarCraft2 is a good enough game as it is. Any further advancements in >>a WarCraft3 would just spoil it. They technology should not be too >>advanced, and should focus more on brute strength and magic then >>technological advances. > >Are you kidding me? The AI is SO BAD!!! --------------------------------- Casey Charlton ca...@larouss.demon.co.uk
Re: WarCraft 3 Suggestions
Author: Allan
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00
15 lines
1185 bytes
1185 bytes
<snip One feature I think would make the game better is a command for the knights called "Listen for help" or something like that. Several times I get a huge group of soldiers outside of a town and I sent one unit in and other by the time I get another moblized to attacked the various enemies, half of the first unit is dead. What's really frustrating about this is the whole time my guys are dying, several dozen soldiers can be standing just a few squares away like bumbs on a log. With a command like "listen for help" or maybe "Listen for battle" the troops slected would automatically run to the assistance of a fellow warrior who was being attacked. (within a certain range, of course.) What do you all think?
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads