Thread View: alt.games.warcraft
9 messages
9 total messages
Started by Catriona R
Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:33
361 in queue... *sigh*
Author: Catriona R
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:33
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:33
8 lines
1206 bytes
1206 bytes
For goodness sake, we're in a totally dead part of the expansion, it should be at an alltime low, yet Draenor is queued?! I am so not looking forward to WoD going live if it's queued *now*, when there's nothing new going on, and so far fewer people playing than usual. I really do wonder why Blizz have never been willing to stick a cap on inbound character transfers, because we've needed that since MoP launch.
Re: 361 in queue... *sigh*
Author: Peter T.
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:01
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 06:01
17 lines
1668 bytes
1668 bytes
Den 11-08-2014 21:33, Catriona R skrev: > > For goodness sake, we're in a totally dead part of the expansion, it > should be at an alltime low, yet Draenor is queued?! I am so not > looking forward to WoD going live if it's queued *now*, when there's > nothing new going on, and so far fewer people playing than usual. I > really do wonder why Blizz have never been willing to stick a cap on > inbound character transfers, because we've needed that since MoP > launch. > Peeps are farming the last mounts, achs etc before they disappear? :) -- Peter T. <https://www.elitedangerous.com/>
Re: 361 in queue... *sigh*
Author: Catriona R
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 23:12
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 23:12
22 lines
1809 bytes
1809 bytes
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:01:54 +0200, "Peter T." <pinoc10@hotmail.cum> wrote: >Den 11-08-2014 21:33, Catriona R skrev: >> >> For goodness sake, we're in a totally dead part of the expansion, it >> should be at an alltime low, yet Draenor is queued?! I am so not >> looking forward to WoD going live if it's queued *now*, when there's >> nothing new going on, and so far fewer people playing than usual. I >> really do wonder why Blizz have never been willing to stick a cap on >> inbound character transfers, because we've needed that since MoP >> launch. >> > >Peeps are farming the last mounts, achs etc before they disappear? :) Could be but I wouldn't have expected to be actually queued, when we don't even have a release date yet. That gives me a REALLY bad feeling about what it'll be like when WoD does go live, MoP launch was bad enough :-/ Quite glad to be seeing some of the zones on beta, when it's only a bit crowded!
Re: 361 in queue... *sigh* and OT sighs
Author: Anon
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 01:39
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 01:39
35 lines
2541 bytes
2541 bytes
On 13/08/2014 8:42 AM, Catriona R wrote: >> Peeps are farming the last mounts, achs etc before they disappear? :) > > Could be but I wouldn't have expected to be actually queued, when we > don't even have a release date yet. That gives me a REALLY bad feeling > about what it'll be like when WoD does go live, MoP launch was bad > enough :-/ Quite glad to be seeing some of the zones on beta, when > it's only a bit crowded! > Is your server merged? Try and log in on the other realms, maybe they are doing something with joint queues?? wild guess. Maybe a psychologist convention created 500 accounts for an experiment? :-) I would try but aren't subbed. Funny thing, I had a few weeks to myself. Pack other half off to Europe. $3500 air fares, drive to airport, couple of coffees waiting for the ridiculous check in delay, $12, car parking for 2 hours $25, drive home oh petrol is 'cheap' at $1.45 $60 of petrol on the way anticipating WOWOWOWOWOWOWOW 18/7 for a week but just can't be bothered spending $15 subbing spent $150 more on petrol and drove 1600 km visiting and lending a hand to friends in the country instead, cat lodging while away $150 I guess I am pretty over it :-( I still like it but just can't face the grind, driving country roads for 20 hours in winter storms at night is more attractive. Prices just to show how ridiculously cheap wow is to play :-)
Re: 361 in queue... *sigh* and OT sighs
Author: Catriona R
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 02:15
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 02:15
52 lines
3263 bytes
3263 bytes
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:09:40 +0930, | || ||| ||||| || | <|||||||||||||||||||||> wrote: >On 13/08/2014 8:42 AM, Catriona R wrote: > >>> Peeps are farming the last mounts, achs etc before they disappear? :) >> >> Could be but I wouldn't have expected to be actually queued, when we >> don't even have a release date yet. That gives me a REALLY bad feeling >> about what it'll be like when WoD does go live, MoP launch was bad >> enough :-/ Quite glad to be seeing some of the zones on beta, when >> it's only a bit crowded! >> > >Is your server merged? >Try and log in on the other realms, maybe they are doing something with >joint queues?? wild guess. Nope, it'll never be merged I think, given the 1500+ queues every day at peak time for a month or more after every patch through the last two expansions... it's one of the 3-4 highest pop in Europe, hence why I'm pretty worried for WoD if it's already getting queued now! >Maybe a psychologist convention created 500 accounts for an experiment? :-) > > >I would try but aren't subbed. > >Funny thing, I had a few weeks to myself. >Pack other half off to Europe. $3500 air fares, drive to airport, couple >of coffees waiting for the ridiculous check in delay, $12, >car parking for 2 hours $25, drive home >oh petrol is 'cheap' at $1.45 $60 of petrol on the way >anticipating WOWOWOWOWOWOWOW 18/7 for a week > >but just can't be bothered spending $15 subbing >spent $150 more on petrol and drove 1600 km visiting and lending a hand >to friends in the country instead, cat lodging while away $150 > >I guess I am pretty over it :-( I still like it but just can't face the >grind, driving country roads for 20 hours in winter storms at night is >more attractive. >Prices just to show how ridiculously cheap wow is to play :-) Hehehe :-) Have to say I'm not playing live a lot, pondering putting my 2nd account on hold, since I mainly play beta at present, but it's so cheap it seems a bit pointless freezing the account (which probably has 2 months+ left on it anyway) only to reopen it come WoD. Still enjoy the game, but it's hard playing the old stuff when I've got shiny new things to look at, even though I do have a bunch of stuff I want to work on on live!
Re: 361 in queue... *sigh* and OT sighs
Author: Catriona R
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 02:27
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 02:27
14 lines
1630 bytes
1630 bytes
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 03:15:06 +0100, Catriona R <catrion...@totalise.co.uk> wrote: >Have to say I'm not playing live a lot, pondering putting >my 2nd account on hold, since I mainly play beta at present, but it's >so cheap it seems a bit pointless freezing the account (which probably >has 2 months+ left on it anyway) only to reopen it come WoD. Heh, good guess, considering I had no idea when it was due... exactly 2 months left on it. Of couse my main one renews next week, but I still play that one at least a couple of times a week, typical! Oh well, no moneysaving for me then, guess I'd better play my 2nd account some more and make it worth it :-P
Re: 361 in queue... *sigh*
Author: death... Ashen Shugar
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 01:39
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 01:39
24 lines
1765 bytes
1765 bytes
I think it was Catriona R <catrion...@totalise.co.uk> that wrote something like... > >For goodness sake, we're in a totally dead part of the expansion, it >should be at an alltime low, yet Draenor is queued?! I am so not >looking forward to WoD going live if it's queued *now*, when there's >nothing new going on, and so far fewer people playing than usual. I >really do wonder why Blizz have never been willing to stick a cap on >inbound character transfers, because we've needed that since MoP >launch. Haven't played WoW in something like a year and a half, but sometime between last week and yesterday, a battle.net login queue has shown up when I go to play Hearthstone. So I'm wondering if your queue isn't so much a server queue as a battle.net queue? Ashen Shugar -- The lions sing and the hills take flight. The moon by day, and the sun by night. Blind woman, deaf man, jackdaw fool. Let the Lord of Chaos rule!
Re: 361 in queue... *sigh*
Author: death... Ashen Shugar
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 01:41
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 01:41
32 lines
2107 bytes
2107 bytes
I think it was death...@yahoo.com.au (Ashen Shugar) that wrote something like... >I think it was Catriona R <catrion...@totalise.co.uk> that wrote >something like... > >> >>For goodness sake, we're in a totally dead part of the expansion, it >>should be at an alltime low, yet Draenor is queued?! I am so not >>looking forward to WoD going live if it's queued *now*, when there's >>nothing new going on, and so far fewer people playing than usual. I >>really do wonder why Blizz have never been willing to stick a cap on >>inbound character transfers, because we've needed that since MoP >>launch. > >Haven't played WoW in something like a year and a half, but sometime >between last week and yesterday, a battle.net login queue has shown up >when I go to play Hearthstone. >So I'm wondering if your queue isn't so much a server queue as a >battle.net queue? > >Ashen Shugar Or maybe it's a "we're futzing with the login servers *now* to hopefully make em handle when WoD goes live better" queue? Ashen Shugar -- The lions sing and the hills take flight. The moon by day, and the sun by night. Blind woman, deaf man, jackdaw fool. Let the Lord of Chaos rule!
Re: 361 in queue... *sigh*
Author: Wallen
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:53
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:53
18 lines
1456 bytes
1456 bytes
On 8/24/2014 6:39 PM, Ashen Shugar wrote: > I think it was Catriona R <catrion...@totalise.co.uk> that wrote > something like... > >> > > Haven't played WoW in something like a year and a half, but sometime > between last week and yesterday, a battle.net login queue has shown up > when I go to play Hearthstone. > So I'm wondering if your queue isn't so much a server queue as a > battle.net queue? > > Ashen Shugar > As it turns out the problem has been a DDOS by a group calling themselves @Lizardsquad. The attack has affected Sony and Playstation networks as well.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads