🚀 go-pugleaf

tfko@glink.net.hk@mailhost.glink.net.hk    (Johnny Ko) writes:

>In <30C1C5...@inmind.com>, Nicholas Clark <ncl...@inmind.com> writes:
>
>>Actually, I do have a clue... Win95 *does* have a wider user base than 
>>OS/2...  Since the high sales in the first month conitnued for several 
>>months up to now, and that win95 is preinstalled on most systems being 
>>sold...  I think you should learn to look beyond you tiny realm of mind!
>>Buy a clue yourself.
>
>You need to count the number of people who de-install the pre-installed
>Window 95 and install the great OS/2 Warp. You should learn to look beyond
>your tiny realm of mind too. Buy a clue yourself.

Don't forget to subtract all the people like me from the total OS/2 Warp
sales.  A year ago I bought Warp, it ran abysmally, ruined my windows
system files, thrashed the HD for simple tasks like moving the mouse, froze
every half hour or so, and ran windows 3.1 programs like they were being
emulated on a C64 (forget about MIDI!).  I removed Warp after two months of
trying to make it work, but it made changes to Windows which haunt that HD
partition to this day.  Now I've bought a new 1.28 gig HD, installed W95
fresh on a partition, and Warp on it's own.  I can't for the life of me
think of any reason to boot into Warp, though, except for the novelty.  On
a virgin install with no apps added, it still freezes up.  95 runs Windows
programs with better realtime performance, and I can't find one single OS/2
program for my needs that doesn't have a better counterpart under Windows. 


 <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<>
  John P Sheehy <jsh...@ix.netcom.com>
 ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>><