🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <49sije$r...@unix2.glink.net.hk> tf...@glink.net.hk  (Johnny Ko) writes:
>In <30C1C5...@inmind.com>, Nicholas Clark <ncl...@inmind.com> writes:
>
>>Actually, I do have a clue... Win95 *does* have a wider user base than 
>>OS/2...  Since the high sales in the first month conitnued for several 
>>months up to now, and that win95 is preinstalled on most systems being 
>>sold...  I think you should learn to look beyond you tiny realm of mind!
>>Buy a clue yourself.
>
>You need to count the number of people who de-install the pre-installed
>Window 95 and install the great OS/2 Warp. You should learn to look beyond
>your tiny realm of mind too. Buy a clue yourself.

Gentlemen, gentlemen... I think you *both* need to buy a clue. Ask yourself
this question:

Who *gives* a @#$% what the "best" operating system is? 

The "best" operating system, for those who don't know, is the one that is
a) easiest for you to understand, and b) gets done what you want to get done.
Which basically means that this whole damn argument is 
a) pointless
b) stupid
c) entirely off-topic

So can we just shut the hell up and talk about Descent, or Doom, or 
PC hardware, and NOT what OS is supposedly the best?

Now, back to more arguments on this matter, because people can't seem to find
the intelligence to shut up about it.

-- 
 "Yes! I am invincible!" - Boris, Goldeneye


  (     (    (   (  ( ((( In Stereo, Where Available ))) )  )   )    )     )