Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #350756Re: Lockboxes, dammit...
From: Catriona R
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:33
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:33
29 lines
2577 bytes
2577 bytes
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:09:46 +0000 (UTC), Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: >Okay, so one time? In band camp? Catriona R <catrion...@totalise.co.uk> was all, like: >> You don't even need to *have* the profession now, except for some >> cosmetic things like bags, the garrison buildings make most things, >> admittedly a bit slower than actually having the professions but >> still. So my main (mining/JC) will get a tailor building and be able >> to run around in crafted tailoring stuff without having to buy it on >> the AH/level my tailor alt... in some ways it's cool, in others it >> feels wrong. > >Oh, that's why. They are moving crafting to the stockade. Hmm. Well, if >that is the case, honestly, I'd probably like it. > >It seems like the stockade should be a BOA feature though... (Build it >once, all your toons can use it). It's actually better having it not accountwide, as you're very limited in numbers of buildings you can have at one time, at least this way multiple alts means more buildings available, to better suit the alt in question (for example if you pvp loads on one alt and not at all on another, you can get the gladiator's sanctum on the pvp alt and not bother on the other one). I currently need 7 alts to cover all crafting professions, reckon that could be more like 2 with careful planning of buildings, if I sacrifice some other useful buildings (I won't, but I could). But with how professions are now, there's not much need to have them all covered anyway... :-/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ca1v4qFp4n1U1@mid.individual.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!xd10ni30608lbb.1!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<c9r1p2F1rbpU1@mid.individual.net> <543b07f1$0$20383$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> <ca0kljFf2ovU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3m7gp.18ek.g.kreme@amelia.local> <ca0p0lFg096U1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3mou2.19n5.g.kreme@amelia.local> <ca1dtnFklipU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3ng8d.1aml.g.kreme@amelia.local>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.112.34.52 with SMTP id w20mr2571630lbi.5.1413203611590; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 05:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!xd10ni30608lbb.1!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Catriona R <catrion...@totalise.co.uk> Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft Subject: Re: Lockboxes, dammit... Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:33:30 +0100 Lines: 29 Message-ID: <ca1v4qFp4n1U1@mid.individual.net> References: <c9r1p2F1rbpU1@mid.individual.net> <543b07f1$0$20383$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> <ca0kljFf2ovU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3m7gp.18ek.g.kreme@amelia.local> <ca0p0lFg096U1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3mou2.19n5.g.kreme@amelia.local> <ca1dtnFklipU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3ng8d.1aml.g.kreme@amelia.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net o0lTdVHQNNcnNxL397Ur3wHdJpt15Fw9OBGura80bXA3gzjI4= Cancel-Lock: sha1:JcMB3DjkPPoAuJgmPrZ0aPVXZ+k= X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 X-NewsProxy: 1.2.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit