🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #350756

Re: Lockboxes, dammit...

#350756
From: Catriona R
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:33
29 lines
2577 bytes
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:09:46 +0000 (UTC), Lewis
<g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:

>Okay, so one time? In band camp? Catriona R <catrion...@totalise.co.uk> was all, like:
>> You don't even need to *have* the profession now, except for some
>> cosmetic things like bags, the garrison buildings make most things,
>> admittedly a bit slower than actually having the professions but
>> still. So my main (mining/JC) will get a tailor building and be able
>> to run around in crafted tailoring stuff without having to buy it on
>> the AH/level my tailor alt... in some ways it's cool, in others it
>> feels wrong.
>
>Oh, that's why. They are moving crafting to the stockade. Hmm. Well, if
>that is the case, honestly, I'd probably like it.
>
>It seems like the stockade should be a BOA feature though... (Build it
>once, all your toons can use it).

It's actually better having it not accountwide, as you're very limited
in numbers of buildings you can have at one time, at least this way
multiple alts means more buildings available, to better suit the alt
in question (for example if you pvp loads on one alt and not at all on
another, you can get the gladiator's sanctum on the pvp alt and not
bother on the other one). I currently need 7 alts to cover all
crafting professions, reckon that could be more like 2 with careful
planning of buildings, if I sacrifice some other useful buildings (I
won't, but I could). But with how professions are now, there's not
much need to have them all covered anyway... :-/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ca1v4qFp4n1U1@mid.individual.net>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!xd10ni30608lbb.1!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
References: <c9r1p2F1rbpU1@mid.individual.net> <543b07f1$0$20383$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> <ca0kljFf2ovU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3m7gp.18ek.g.kreme@amelia.local> <ca0p0lFg096U1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3mou2.19n5.g.kreme@amelia.local> <ca1dtnFklipU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3ng8d.1aml.g.kreme@amelia.local>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.112.34.52 with SMTP id w20mr2571630lbi.5.1413203611590;        Mon, 13 Oct 2014 05:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!xd10ni30608lbb.1!nntp.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Catriona R <catrion...@totalise.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft
Subject: Re: Lockboxes, dammit...
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:33:30 +0100
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <ca1v4qFp4n1U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <c9r1p2F1rbpU1@mid.individual.net> <543b07f1$0$20383$b1db1813$e2fc9064@news.astraweb.com> <ca0kljFf2ovU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3m7gp.18ek.g.kreme@amelia.local> <ca0p0lFg096U1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3mou2.19n5.g.kreme@amelia.local> <ca1dtnFklipU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnm3ng8d.1aml.g.kreme@amelia.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net o0lTdVHQNNcnNxL397Ur3wHdJpt15Fw9OBGura80bXA3gzjI4=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JcMB3DjkPPoAuJgmPrZ0aPVXZ+k=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
X-NewsProxy: 1.2.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit