Article View: alt.games.warcraft
Article #350268Re: LFR nerfed...
From: Peter T.
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 07:26
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 07:26
37 lines
2817 bytes
2817 bytes
Den 01-05-2014 15:06, Catriona R skrev: > It's entirely possible that they don't like organised raiding, or > don't have the time to commit to it. I've never done a flex raid, and > there's plenty pugs on my realm, plus I actually do meet the stupid > ilvl requirements most use - I just don't enjoy it and don't want to > dedicate a big chunk of time to it. I still imagine your guildies like > having the option to get tier pieces in LFR, both in looks and > setbonuses :-) Of course everybody wants the best gear. No doubt. But again. I guess a good majority of the players who doesnt raid occasionally are fine with or at least has accepted their position as they prolly never will be able to get their hands on raid items due to real life issues or just simply "I enjoy killing a mob and do a quest now and then". In my guild we have a handful of real-life couples where the other part just play the game for an hour or two now a few times a week. > Yes, but why *take away* what we've had for two years? It all started in wotlk after winning Wintergrasp. We got access to the small pewpew raid where we could win set bonus gear. :) I cant talk about Cata as I skipped this expansion completely. > Guess the elitist whiners got their wish, but it seems daft to punish > a large proportion of players just because a few vocal idiots don't > like others getting lower versions of "their" loot... I imagine most so-called elitist whiners arent that old anyway. Some other just have silly personalities. So I couldnt care less about them. And dont forget whiners are able to "fill a room" with their negative attitude and bad karma despite they are a waste minority. -- Peter T. <https://elite.frontier.co.uk/>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ljvhaa$4fe$1@speranza.aioe.org>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gi6ni717igc.0!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<bsd0r0Fm888U1@mid.individual.net> <ljrv58$466$1@speranza.aioe.org> <bsdh3sFpighU1@mid.individual.net> <ljt1rb$ak4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <bsev7nF41ilU1@mid.individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.182.135.167 with SMTP id pt7mr894473obb.14.1399015566291; Fri, 02 May 2014 00:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gi6ni717igc.0!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Peter T." <pinoc10@hotmail.cum> Newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft Subject: Re: LFR nerfed... Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 09:26:04 +0200 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 37 Message-ID: <ljvhaa$4fe$1@speranza.aioe.org> References: <bsd0r0Fm888U1@mid.individual.net> <ljrv58$466$1@speranza.aioe.org> <bsdh3sFpighU1@mid.individual.net> <ljt1rb$ak4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <bsev7nF41ilU1@mid.individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lkHrEv2lS6B5SaM+sXTU6A.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: ab...@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140501-0, 02-05-2014), Outbound message Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit