🚀 go-pugleaf

"Skid" <sk...@attbi.com> wrote in
news:F2zX9.784436$WL3.784774@rwcrnsc54: 

> 
> "Jay "Boogieman" Edwards" <boog...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns930B6BD426C35boogie350NOSPAMyahoo@216.168.3.44...
> 
>> > so saying an Athlon 1800+ is the equivalent of a Pentium 4 1.5Ghz
>> > is incorrect, performence-wise
>> > price-wise that might be correct >)
>>
>> I didn't say *anything* about it's performance whatsoever, just
>> posted a link with the clock speeds.
>> ____________________________________________________
> 
> But you posted the link with no comment right behind someone who had
> corrected a mistake about the XP 1800+ having performance equivalent
> to a P4 1.5.
> 
> "Diavire" said the XP 1800+ performed "more like 1.8-2Ghz" P4.
> 
> Then you said, "no, it's around 1.5 GHz. 1800 is not the speed of the
> processor."
> 
> Maybe you misread him, maybe he misread you, but the point was getting
> lost either way.
> 
> Top-posting vs bottom posting is even more of a bullshit personal
> preference argument than AMD vs Intel. Finger-pointing and
> name-calling on either side is silly. Meanwhile this thread, my posts
> included, has gotten way off topic. I'm outta' here.
> 
> 
> 

me too... 

-- 
____________________________________________________
Windows is suck! All you harddrive are belong to us!
 Please click 'OK' to install our trojan keylogger 
       or 'CANCEL' to install it regardless!  
                   Thank You. 

               The Microsoft Team