Article View: alt.games.unreal
Article #172033Re: 39 FPS on UT 2003 with Radeon 9700 !
From: Skid
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:47
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:47
28 lines
2395 bytes
2395 bytes
"Jay "Boogieman" Edwards" <boog...@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns930B6BD426C35boogie350NOSPAMyahoo@216.168.3.44... > > so saying an Athlon 1800+ is the equivalent of a Pentium 4 1.5Ghz is > > incorrect, performence-wise > > price-wise that might be correct >) > > I didn't say *anything* about it's performance whatsoever, just posted a > link with the clock speeds. > ____________________________________________________ But you posted the link with no comment right behind someone who had corrected a mistake about the XP 1800+ having performance equivalent to a P4 1.5. "Diavire" said the XP 1800+ performed "more like 1.8-2Ghz" P4. Then you said, "no, it's around 1.5 GHz. 1800 is not the speed of the processor." Maybe you misread him, maybe he misread you, but the point was getting lost either way. Top-posting vs bottom posting is even more of a bullshit personal preference argument than AMD vs Intel. Finger-pointing and name-calling on either side is silly. Meanwhile this thread, my posts included, has gotten way off topic. I'm outta' here.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<F2zX9.784436$WL3.784774@rwcrnsc54>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc54.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<c4d04f8b.0301212001.303ccd2b@posting.google.com> <v2s69lb7e9052a@corp.supernews.com> <3e2e2031$0$139$e4fe514c@dreader7.news.xs4all.nl> <Xns930B5074795D2boogie350NOSPAMyahoo@216.168.3.44> <3e2ea07b$0$2246$e4fe514c@dreader6.news.xs4all.nl> <Xns930B6BD426C35boogie350NOSPAMyahoo@216.168.3.44>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc54.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Skid" <sk...@attbi.com> Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.games.unreal.tournament2003,alt.games.unreal References: <c4d04f8b.0301212001.303ccd2b@posting.google.com> <v2s69lb7e9052a@corp.supernews.com> <3e2e2031$0$139$e4fe514c@dreader7.news.xs4all.nl> <Xns930B5074795D2boogie350NOSPAMyahoo@216.168.3.44> <3e2ea07b$0$2246$e4fe514c@dreader6.news.xs4all.nl> <Xns930B6BD426C35boogie350NOSPAMyahoo@216.168.3.44> Subject: Re: 39 FPS on UT 2003 with Radeon 9700 ! Lines: 30 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <F2zX9.784436$WL3.784774@rwcrnsc54> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.125.32.244 X-Complaints-To: ab...@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc54 1043250469 24.125.32.244 (Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:47:49 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:47:49 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:47:49 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit