Article View: alt.games.unreal.tournament
Article #191219Mouse Keyboard Mousing Surface Revisited
From: §ď×darts
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:14
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:14
74 lines
5922 bytes
5922 bytes
I have to thank Folk for the advice on the mousing surface. The IceMat is excellent! What I ended up doing was getting a Razer Copperhead, a Razer Pro (white mouse built pretty much identicle to the copperhead), 2 IceMat second editions and 2 Razer Pro Mousing Surfaces. I don't know which I like better from the mousing surfaces. The IceMat is smooth. The Razer Pro is somehow a little faster. I learned from the textured surface of the lousy ratpadz that the texture can eat the feet off a mouse (and I forgot to order the mouse skates, but I'll get those ordered today), so I'm going to bet that a few months from now I'll be looking at the feet wishing I had gone 100% with the IceMats. Both surfaces stay very cool and are big enough to be comfortable (both are an inch or so longer and wider than the ratpadz). The Razer Copperhead and Razer Pro mice are pretty amazing. It took a day or so to get used to, but I doubt I'll ever want a different mouse. In fact, I'm going to replace every mouse I have with these. - My reading indicates they have durability issues, and I've already experienced the random disconnection problem that seems to plague the copperhead and a few of Razers other products. - I'm also pretty sure it's a driver problem and not a defect in the materials. I'm almost certain I've solved the problem with mine. Even if it is expensive and has durability problems, I don't care. The older I get, the pickier I get and the more pennies I pinch. Normally, any product that even gives me so much as a hint of reliability or durability problems would be avoided or discarded in favor of a "better" product. - If I had to replace a copperhead or pro twice a year, I'd do it. In a few short days, I've become addicted to this mouse. There are at least a hundred reviews on the web about the copperhead, so I won't get too detailed. - The reviews will all tell you that the right side buttons are pretty much useless. I think that's true to a degree (unless you are a leftie, of course). I left mine at the default of being the DPI switching buttons so it's not like I'm going to use them more than a few times during a gaming session. The copperhead and pro are the smoothest, most accurate, and most comfortable mice I've ever had the pleasure to use. All of the buttons are sensitive. That took some getting used to. While gaming, it's very easy to get a little excited and apply some pressure to the mouse. That can result in side buttons being triggered at inopportune times. Also, the length of the primary and secondary buttons (left and right clickers) coupled with their sensitivity was a little hard to get used to. Any pressure from any part of the finger can trigger the right or left click... pretty much all the way back to the knuckle. I have a bit of a tendency to apply some pressure as far back as my second finger joint when repositioning my mouse, so I had to make a change to an old habit. I don't really think I like my mouse being all lit up... there is no way to turn off the lights, but at least they aren't so bright as to be distracting. If I were younger, I would probably be thinking that the lights are "cool" and might even consider that feature to be a plus. My tastes have changed with age, and I no longer buy cases with side windows and cold cathode lights and LED fans and polished aluminum fan grills etc etc. I don't think I've gotten so old to return to buying beige cases, but I really don't want or need bliking or pulsating lights on my computer gear any more. That makes the Razer Pro a more desireable mouse for me, I think. I haven't really found any difference between the copperhead and the Pro other than the copperhead is lit up and the pro is just white with no lights. I've always been OK with my Microsoft Optical mice and the occasional Logitech I've had. I've been happy enough with thier comfort and features. I've always wished for just a little bit better accuracy (specifically when working with images and drawings). But all in all, I've been more or less satisfied. Well, these Razer mice are a real treat. The only way I can say it is this: "These are luxury mice for sure." - For the last few years (until my recent new build), my upgrade decisions have all been designed to make me more comfortable at my workstations and for me to enjoy using my workstations more - things like larger flat panel monitors, better speakers, more storage, more ergonomic and comfortable chairs etc etc etc. Had I realized that a mouse could make this much of a difference in my work (and play) environment, I would have upgraded my mice long ago.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<LaadnUPDYaURAlDanZ2dnUVZ_s-pnZ2d@giganews.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 13:14:20 -0600 Newsgroups: alt.games.unreal.tournament Subject: Mouse Keyboard Mousing Surface Revisited From: §ď×darts <sixdartsREMOVE@hotmail.com> Reply-to: sixdartsREMOVE@hotmail.com Organization: Dewi Decimal System Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:14:05 GMT X-Newsreader: News Rover 13.1.3 Message-ID: <LaadnUPDYaURAlDanZ2dnUVZ_s-pnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 74 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-31R2pEMIHtqKxPT1hsu07wBuD25e4Q3eZpyT/UrUfRcWuLIvvmrc/dlbApta00qsNLWB1kEqz5d7/gk!lEhCfkKLYcJD8qu/g/1lOkgt9pSoUiXQZ/GUXHcFeSDUjN2Nnvv+/XNl4sQXJYRm4qyUuKfdeZHO X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.37 Bytes: 5759 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit