🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.starcraft
Article #293218

Blizzard is ditching the Battle.net name

#293218
From: Mr. Man-wai Chang
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:39
36 lines
3298 bytes
Source: 
https://www.engadget.com/2016/09/21/blizzard-dropping-battle-net-name/

Now that online gaming services are a given, there's no need for special 
branding.


Battle.net has been synonymous with Blizzard for most of the game 
studio's history, and for good reason: from Diablo onward, the online 
service helped usher in the concept of free, fully-integrated 
multiplayer matchmaking. Times have changed, however, and Blizzard is 
putting the Battle.net name to rest. The underlying technology will 
remain, but you'll see it referred to simply as Blizzard technology. The 
Battle.net label is outdated in an era where native multiplayer support 
is "more of a normal expectation" than a novelty, the developer says. 
Moreover, the branding is sometimes confusing and redundant. Why does 
Blizzard have to treat its own service as a separate beast?

The transition should take place over the "next several months."

It's a sad day for longstanding Blizzard fans, but you could also say 
that it's overdue. The Battle.net name is a holdover from the days when 
GameSpy, TEN and other third-party services were virtually necessary to 
join online games for those players not intimately familiar with IP 
addresses. They lost their main reason for being when many games started 
treating multiplayer as a central feature, and broadband internet access 
made it almost trivially easy to find and join matches.


-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ns0qe7$knb$1@dont-email.me>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!w143ni9278itb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Received: by 10.157.15.71 with SMTP id 65mr302765ott.105.1474555152117;        Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: alt.games.starcraft@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.157.15.42 with SMTP id 39ls2540442ott.0.gmail; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.13.210.129 with SMTP id u123mr298964ywd.148.1474555151937;        Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!w143ni9278itb.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.games.starcraft,alt.games.diablo2
Subject: Blizzard is ditching the Battle.net name
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 22:39:12 +0800
Organization: Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <ns0qe7$knb$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:39:03 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b48a0fb7b5ac7c028ca5c1eb90300b75"; logging-data="21227"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18hLl2VNnYb4aM/Q39SGMN8"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
X-Mozilla-News-Host: snews://news.eternal-september.org:563
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LrFuW19Mg/EdtgfL87ti/NZqs6g=
Bytes: 2942
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit