🚀 go-pugleaf

MuuMiMan wrote:
> IN TEH PALECE KNOWEN AS alt.games.starcraft, TEH FAGGORTER Luc The
> Perverse <ataylor_no_spa_am@_letterC_solutions.n3t> DUMPED HIS GHEYE
> SHIET ON MY COMPUTAR SCREEN!!!!:
>> MuuMiMan wrote:
>>> IN TEH PALECE KNOWEN AS alt.games.starcraft, TEH FAGGORTER Luc The
>>> Perverse <ataylor_no_spa_am@_letterC_solutions.n3t> DUMPED HIS GHEYE
>>> SHIET ON MY COMPUTAR SCREEN!!!!:
>>>> MuuMiMan wrote:
>>>>> IN TEH PALECE KNOWEN AS alt.games.starcraft, TEH FAGGORTER Luc The
>>>>> Perverse <ataylor_no_spa_am@_letterC_solutions.n3t> DUMPED HIS GHEYE
>>>>> SHIET ON MY COMPUTAR SCREEN!!!!:
>>>>>> MuuMiMan wrote:
>>>>>>> IN TEH PALECE KNOWEN AS alt.games.starcraft, TEH FAGGORTER Luc The
>>>>>>> Perverse <ataylor_no_spa_am@_letterC_solutions.n3t> DUMPED HIS GHEYE
>>>>>>> SHIET ON MY COMPUTAR SCREEN!!!!:
>>>>>>>> My comment was clearly sarcasm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I do not believe I could beat them if it were 2 vs 1 the other way around.
>>>>>>> Well you could start by first winning a 2v1 against me :/
>>>>>> I am far too busy writing apps, doing my job and learning Japanese to 
>>>>>> play games.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Speaking of which, I need a break - I think I will play some Mario world.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually I lost my starcraft CD key - I need a new one.  Chris Mears' 
>>>>>> girlfriend wanted to play me which is when I realized it.
>>>>> Poor excuse for a dodge, just be a man admit you didn't want to lose
>>>>> to her.
>>>>>
>>>> You know I actually went to hastings to buy a CD key last night but 
>>>> bought some gum and "300" instead
>>> Install Hamachi, problem solved!
>>>
>>> ...And you get better network latency than on b.net, too.
>>>
>> WTF is Hamachi?
> 
> zero-configuration VPN service.
> 
> www.hamachi.cc
> 
> Allows you to play SC through UDP LAN mode, which suits much better
> for modern day high-bandwidth/low-latency connections, seeing the
> Battle.net mode in SC is gimped/optimized for 28.8k dial-up from 10
> years ago, and comes with a built-in latency setting of roughly half a
> second, which is kind of gay in this day when there's a better
> alternative available.

This does not mean I do not wish to patronize Blizzard or have a ready 
option for people who do not have time to configure a zero-configuration 
VPN service.

I may check it out - but seriously, don't think you've tricked me into 
losing against you yet.

--
LTP

:)