Article View: alt.games.starcraft
Article #292123Re: Battlecruiser vs. Carrier
From: Jon
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:29
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:29
34 lines
2729 bytes
2729 bytes
On May 24, 1:24 pm, "Just Another Victim of the Ambient Morality" <i_hat...@hotmail.com> wrote: > "Jon" <dini...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1179387227.008384.71360@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > > > > > So I guess the questions I have are as follows: > > (1)Could a carrier beat a battlecruiser in a one-on-one battle? And > > how? > > Generally, no. You can try to get the interceptors to attack the battle > cruiser and then fly to the perimeter of the cruiser's attack range but the > carrier is no faster than it so, if both are micromanaged, the cruiser would > just chase the carrier and ensure that it's within attacking range... > I would hope this goes without saying but I guess I'll mention it, > anyways. Against most types of units, the carrier has more damage > throughput than the battle cruiser so, in many ways, it's a more powerful > unit. However, it doesn't do as well against heavily armoured units as the > battle cruiser does... > > > (2)Could any unit outrun a charging yamato gun? More specifically, > > could a carrier? If so, what is the difference between moving the > > carrier away, and using an ability, such as recall, to transport the > > unit away. > > I'm surprised more people don't know about this. > No unit can "outrun" a yamato gun. Once the yamato gun has been cast on > a unit, it will get hit, regardless of where it is. Even if you were to > recall the unit across the entire map, the shot will just traverse the > entire map to hit it... Wow. I didn't know that. Thanks.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1180052944.082649.248830@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1179387227.008384.71360@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <fwm5i.561672$c62.57727@fe07.news.easynews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Jon <dini...@gmail.com> Newsgroups: alt.games.starcraft Subject: Re: Battlecruiser vs. Carrier Date: 24 May 2007 17:29:04 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 35 Message-ID: <1180052944.082649.248830@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com> References: <1179387227.008384.71360@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <fwm5i.561672$c62.57727@fe07.news.easynews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.138.140.32 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1180052976 1979 127.0.0.1 (25 May 2007 00:29:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 00:29:36 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <fwm5i.561672$c62.57727@fe07.news.easynews.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups...@google.com Injection-Info: r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.138.140.32; posting-account=ZJZGyw0AAACLSb3IdXr-CnxUTETTEfZx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit