🚀 go-pugleaf

"Luc The Perverse" <sll_noSpamli...@cc.usu.edu> wrote in message 
news:cn4lh3xqre.ln2@loki.cmears.id.au...
> "Frans" <phasys3...@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> news:124eg36gig4vbf6@corp.supernews.com...
>> And no, it's no reason to kill them, but the killer is crazy, and crazy 
>> people do crazy
>> things. If it wasn't this, they would have gone and done something else. 
>> But the fact
>> that a few child molesters got killed by some crazy individual, does not 
>> mean that you
>> should NOT protect the VICTIMS of child molesters.
>
> I agree.  Children should be protected from people would take advantage of 
> them or hurt them.  Like drug dealers, murderers, insane people, witches 
> and trolls, gang members and schoolyard bullies.  None of these people 
> appear in public registries.
>
> I have a few assumptions which you do not appear to agree with.
> 1. Sex registries do no protect victims.  At best they shift victims from 
> the more paranoid to the less paranoid.
> 2. Sexual offenses are not unique crimes.   If you are going to have 
> criminal registries then list everyone and everything, or maybe limit it 
> to Felonies - but don't choose one crime and make a registry for it.
> 3. Not all sex crimes are the same.   A man who flashes strippers at a 
> club is not sufficiently predisposed to child molestation to justify 
> posting a page about him.
> 4. Cyric is cool.


I disagree to all (why I am not sure) except number 4. That bastard has 
apparently ditch us again.
-- 
Steven Ung
The Ignorant Asian