🚀 go-pugleaf

"Frans" <phasys3...@yahoo.com> wrote in message 
news:124eg36gig4vbf6@corp.supernews.com...
> And no, it's no reason to kill them, but the killer is crazy, and crazy 
> people do crazy
> things. If it wasn't this, they would have gone and done something else. 
> But the fact
> that a few child molesters got killed by some crazy individual, does not 
> mean that you
> should NOT protect the VICTIMS of child molesters.

I agree.  Children should be protected from people would take advantage of 
them or hurt them.  Like drug dealers, murderers, insane people, witches and 
trolls, gang members and schoolyard bullies.  None of these people appear in 
public registries.

I have a few assumptions which you do not appear to agree with.
1. Sex registries do no protect victims.  At best they shift victims from 
the more paranoid to the less paranoid.
2. Sexual offenses are not unique crimes.   If you are going to have 
criminal registries then list everyone and everything, or maybe limit it to 
Felonies - but don't choose one crime and make a registry for it.
3. Not all sex crimes are the same.   A man who flashes strippers at a club 
is not sufficiently predisposed to child molestation to justify posting a 
page about him.
4. Cyric is cool.

--
LTP

:)