🚀 go-pugleaf

"Tynan Carrick" <geoo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cgbvkt$f6b$1@cnn.cns.ksu.edu...
> > We are at a point in technology where very few to zero people actually
> NEED
> > to work.  Most essential tasks could be done by pre-programmed robots.
> Most
> > jobs are otherwise useless filler.  Almost every desk job is useless
> filler.
> > Keeping "work" in place serves as nothing more than a way for those in
> power
> > to stay in power.  Without "work" the class system would be obliterated.
>
> I disagree; even humans are still required for desk jobs, simply for
> abstract thinking. If left for computers to do, then they are bound within
> their programming, and the occational much-needed random task that needs
to
> be done can't be accomplished.

almost every desk job is redundant filler.  You get robots to produce food.
That's prett much all you really need.

> Example: I work in a warehouse that on occation due to logistics and gov't
> regs, we keep a close eye on orders. If we need to hold a truck over or
> "short and ship" it, then we need the approval of someone who can make a
> guess about the coming events of the next day to give us the ok on what to
> do. You might be able to replace the loader, but you can't make a computer
> make a decision based on guesses. You'd have to set a boundary, and by
doing
> that, you can't have the maching break it's programming to make
spontaneous
> decisions.

Regulations are pointless bureaucracy.  Waiting for approval, holding things
over for what amounts to no reason at all.  It's all useless middle man
garbage to create work for people.

--
Ramen Junkie

http://www.lameazoid.com