Article View: alt.games.quake2
Article #270978Celeron vs. P3 for gaming?
From: qwer...
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00
13 lines
1078 bytes
1078 bytes
I can't take it any more, the P166 is going to server duty and I'm building a new system. My question is this: I have been advised by several game-junky friends that it's not worth the extra $ to get a P3 chip over a minimum 600mHz Celeron. True of not? Cause I certainly have better things to do with the extra bucks. I just want something that won't choke on wide-open maps with lots of models (ie- arena-type railgun only servers). Thanks!! Mark Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8urj96$1f0$1@nnrp1.deja.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: qwer...@my-deja.com Subject: Celeron vs. P3 for gaming? Date: 2000/11/14 Message-ID: <8urj96$1f0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Deja-AN: 693489063 X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 cache4, 1.0 x71.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 158.111.217.31, 158.111.4.24 Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. X-Article-Creation-Date: Tue Nov 14 14:47:04 2000 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDqwerty700 Newsgroups: alt.games.quake2 X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.7 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit