Article View: alt.games.quake2
Article #270981Re: Celeron vs. P3 for gaming?
From: joe crouse
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 00:00
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 00:00
58 lines
3402 bytes
3402 bytes
i can vouch for the durons they rock the tbirds too but whats wrong with the k6-2's everyone bashes them but they rock MuuMiMan wrote: > In a place known as alt.games.quake2, n...@spam.com (Pekka) was running > around screaming something about "Re: Celeron vs. P3 for gaming?". > Before the men in white coats arrived and took him away, he managed to > say the following: > >In article <8urj96$1f0$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>, qwer...@my-deja.com says... > >> > >>I can't take it any more, the P166 is going to server duty and I'm > >>building a new system. My question is this: I have been advised by > >>several game-junky friends that it's not worth the extra $ to get a P3 > >>chip over a minimum 600mHz Celeron. True of not? > > It's true that the Pentium 3 is "expensive". But it _is_ faster than > the Celeron by 10-30%, depending on what you're doing with it. For > gaming, the P3 is definitively better of the two. A P3- Coppermine 600 > is about as fast as a Celemine overclocked to 850 MHZ... > > >Cause I certainly have > >>better things to do with the extra bucks. I just want something that > >>won't choke on wide-open maps with lots of models (ie- arena-type > >>railgun only servers). Thanks!! > >> > >Buy Duron. It's cheaper and way much faster than Celerons. Almost beats P3 > >too... ANd with the extra bucks u can buy nice video card. I'd recommend some > >Geforce2 MX card, good performance and reasonable price. > > He's right, listen to him ;-) > Whatever you do, go for an AMD chip anyway - they're good nowdays(the > athlon is quite a leap from the K6 series of CPUs...), and offer by > far the best bang for the buck. You can get an Athlon TB 800 quite a > lot cheaper than a P3-800, and the Athlon is even a tad bit faster... > The Duron outperforms the celeron by a lot (IIRC it was according to > tests about 0-10% slower than an Athlon on the same clock speed), and > is by far the best choice of the current processors on the market if > you're looking for the "best performance with lowest > investment"-processor... > > -- > The Melodramatic MuuMi > > "Forty-two! Is that all you've got to show for seven and a half million years' work?" > "I checked it very thoroughly, and that quite definitely is the answer. I think the problem, to be quite honest with you, is that you've never actually known what the question is." > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GU dx s+:- a--- C++ UL P L+ E---- W++ N++ o? > K- w !O M- V? PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t-- 5-- X-- > R tv-- b DI+ D++ G e* h! r- y? > -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > ICQ: 26741225 > E-Mail: muumiSPAM@MEmbnet.fiHERE! > > Remove the nospam thingy for valid E-mail adress.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3A131549.F950A885@home.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8urj96$1f0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8urqms$5ei$1@tron.sci.fi> <3a12a4e4.183061@uutiset.nic.fi>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: joe crouse <joecr...@home.com> Subject: Re: Celeron vs. P3 for gaming? Date: 2000/11/15 Message-ID: <3A131549.F950A885@home.com> X-Deja-AN: 694095806 References: <8urj96$1f0$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8urqms$5ei$1@tron.sci.fi> <3a12a4e4.183061@uutiset.nic.fi> X-Accept-Language: en X-Complaints-To: ab...@home.net X-Trace: news1.rdc1.md.home.com 974328936 24.9.151.15 (Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:55:36 PST) Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 14:55:36 PST Newsgroups: alt.games.quake2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit