🚀 go-pugleaf

<test@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:pn6ls119ihnh82316s1i9kaiuh357gdnta@4ax.com...
> Try WinQuake.  It is a win32 native version of quake (netquake) and is
> an id software compile that they put out in early '97 I think.

right, have it somewhere, will scrounge it up :)
McG.

and for matt:
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:21:44 -0800, "Matthew Vaughan"
> <matt-no-spam-109@NOSPAM.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:VOXwf.3198$v05.1241@tornado.texas.rr.com...
>>> eQuake/FUHQuake are complete engine makeovers.   They are NOT original
>>> Quake
>>
>>True enough; they're significant improvements of the same source code as 
>>the
>>original Quake engine.

I don't agree with that opinion.

>>
>>> and don't play like they are.
>>
>>Yes they do. Despite default settings that enable some graphical upgrades,

I said play, not look

>>they can look exactly like GLQuake/GLQuakeWorld, which is how I've always
>>used FuhQuake at least. It's not like they change the game physics, or 
>>even
>>the sound or graphics (if you've got them set back to old-fashioned
>>settings).
>>
>>>   To date, I haven't found a complete command/var list for FUH.
>>
>>That's true, some of the settings are different, but some of the old ones
>>people were used to are no longer needed.

For their mod.  Old skool quakers want em and will have em.

>>
>>> Their game isn't doable for me, I don't play it,
>>
>>Your loss.

Not for me it isn't.
>>
>>> and I don't recommend it.
>>
>>I do. Virtually anyone who plays Quake online these days is using it, too.
>>
>