🚀 go-pugleaf

This is in reference to <MPG.10dfd426...@news.demon.co.uk>, in which a
one ma...@mhetherington.demon.co.uk (Mark) wrote:
> In article <4ljd2.3349$961....@server1.news.adelphia.net>, 
> tabmok99....@damnspaz.com says...
> > Shared intimacy and pleasure and all that good stuff is fine - but you must 
> > remember God (or nature, if you prefer) made sex oureky for reproduction and
>  
> > the survival of the species.
> 
> If intercourse is solely for reproduction why is it pleasurable? 

To make it desirable, therefore ensuring the survival of any species.

> Especially since the birthing process (the result of reproduction) is so 
> painful.

Pleasure is spiked with pain.

> > Then that's the thing - humans can do things just for *wanting* to.  Animals
> > have to wait until it's a necessity.
> 
> Not entirely accurate.

No, but true for the most part.

> > > > > I would consider you a murderer.
> > > > Well, you'd be wrong then.
> > > Only in your eyes.
> > Maybe, maybe not.  I bet someone would back me up.
> 
> If not maybe you would just go to prison and that may very well alter 
> your perception of things.

Again, maybe, maybe not.  I wouldn't be in the situation anyway.

> > Well it is!  If I moved to some country where it was legal to kill gay
>  people, 
> > I still couldn't bring myself to do it.
> 
> So you deny God out of personal choice. Were you not saying that all 
> Christians should follow all of his laws and not choose the ones they 
> wanted to follow?

But like I said, there's a difference between doing something you're not 
supposed to and not doing something you're supposed to.  The latter isn't
as bad, but the former is far worse.

_|    _|  _|_|_|  Visit the Kombat Pavilion today.
_|  _|    _|  _|  http://come.to/the.kombat.pavilion
_|_|      _|_|_|
_|  _|    _|
_|    _|  _|