Article View: alt.games.mk
Article #427Re: Crying Lui Kang--MY SIDE OF THE STORY!!
From: k... Kenton P. Zinn
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1993 06:27
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1993 06:27
59 lines
3497 bytes
3497 bytes
In a previous article, ree...@rodan.syr.edu (Ronald E. Eddy) says: > >In article <1993Nov5.1...@newstand.syr.edu> jrta...@rodan.syr.edu (Jack R. Tallent) writes: >> I regularly play the same person every day during lunch. I usually >>play Raiden against his Liu Kang. Before I begin, let me just mention that >>this guy double kicks the shit out of me on a regular basis and does fire ball >>flying kick combos as well: both very effective combos. >> Well, today he was crying 'Cheap!' because I backed him into a corner >>and flying tackled him three times in a row. Is this cheap? (Be honest, as I >>will not do it any more if the consensus is against this move.) Is this move >>really 'unblockable' as Liu 'crybaby' Kang was claiming? > > >The reason I am crying 'Cheap!' is because if the move is executed with >the proper speed, it is unblockable, and you can use it repeatedly to totally >finish off the opponent. The only way out of the corner is if Raiden has the >slightest hesitation, which gives the opponent a chance to step out of the >corner and block, or to jump over the incoming dive. If the dive is done >quick enough, there is no way out. This in *no way* compares to the double >flying kick or to the fireball/flying kick. Yes the opponent is helpless >for ONE hit, but ONLY ONE hit. Raiden's dive into the corner is comparable >to Sonya's leg grab and the freeze/throw combo of SubZero. If they hit >you with one of these moves ONCE, then with proper execution (which anyone >who is fairly decent at the game should have) the opponent is defenseless >for repeat attacks until dead. With Raiden, you don't even have to get >backed into the corner (which I wasn't). If you are on the outer-third of >the playing field, Raiden's dive will put you into the corner, in that oh >so defenseless position. In other words, if you make *one* mistake >against Raiden, you are dead (at the discretion of whoever is playing >Raiden, of course) If you make a mistake against LK, then you get hit one >extra time, and the fight goes on. > >One other thought. This isn't the first time this has happened, and >whenever it does, it always seems to be in the third round of a match. If you >are going to use an arguably cheap move, you don't use it in the third >round of a match. His argument is "Well, I didn't kill you with it", no >you didn't (this time...), but you took so much of my strength that all you >had to was spit on me and I'd fall over dead. > >So, we leave this to the gods of the Internet to decide.... > > Don't worry, just deal with it...find some way cheap to retaliate...or wait till MK 2 is out (nationally).... Bruce Lee always said "For every action , there is a counter action" its true even when talking about mortal kombat... >Ron (aka Lui 'crybaby' Kang) > > > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2bfg4h$73j@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!po.CWRU.Edu!kpzReferences:
<1993Nov5.151523.2177@newstand.syr.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!po.CWRU.Edu!kpz From: k...@po.CWRU.Edu (Kenton P. Zinn) Newsgroups: rec.games.video.arcade,alt.games.mk Subject: Re: Crying Lui Kang--MY SIDE OF THE STORY!! Date: 6 Nov 1993 06:27:29 GMT Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA) Lines: 60 Message-ID: <2bfg4h$73j@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> References: <1993Nov5.151523.2177@newstand.syr.edu> Reply-To: k...@po.CWRU.Edu (Kenton P. Zinn) NNTP-Posting-Host: eeyore.ins.cwru.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit