🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.games.duke3d
24 messages
24 total messages Started by Dukey Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:19
Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78054
Author: Dukey
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:19
3 lines
1257 bytes
George and the rest of 3-D crew better get off their pompous arses and
finish this thing before no one cares anymore.  I know I have lost faith in
them a looooogn time ago.
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78055
Author: Raymond Martineau
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:19
6 lines
1334 bytes
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:19:56 -0500, "Dukey" <nospam@home.com> wrote:

>George and the rest of 3-D crew better get off their pompous arses and
>finish this thing before no one cares anymore. 

Isn't that deadline set a bit too early?  Perhaps by... three years?
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78056
Author: Steve Long
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:30
11 lines
1318 bytes

> George and the rest of 3-D crew better get off their pompous arses
....snip
******************
Did you see the previous 'vapor award' post?
Check this out:
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,61935,00.html

Kids have been born and are now in school since it was first announced!
Steve
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78057
Author: Kent_Diego
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:50
4 lines
1104 bytes
DNF looks to be the top priority. Lets hope it's soon.
http://www.3drealms.com/games.html

-Kent
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78058
Author: Tom Breton
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:53
12 lines
1181 bytes
"Kent_Diego" <None@Nomicrosoft.com> writes:

> DNF looks to be the top priority. Lets hope it's soon.
> http://www.3drealms.com/games.html
> 

Having won that vaporware lifetime achievment award, they don't want
to rest on their laurels!  }:)


-- 
Tom Breton, calm-eyed visionary
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78059
Author: Todd
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 20:25
17 lines
1571 bytes
"Kent_Diego" <None@Nomicrosoft.com> wrote:

>DNF looks to be the top priority. Lets hope it's soon.
>http://www.3drealms.com/games.html
>
>-Kent
>


Pay attention.  The game has supposedly been in the works for SIX
YEARS!  There are no screen shots or demos available.  There is no
release date beyond "When it's done."

They particularly tell you not to pre-order the game.  That's because
the game does NOT EXIST and never has.

It's a humongous joke.
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78060
Author: Steve Long
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 21:04
6 lines
1369 bytes
Todd
You be so right. That's why we call it 'vapor ware'.
Like I alured to in a previous post, a friend of my wife was pregnant when
the game was first mentioned, as coming 'soon'. The kid is in school now.
The way things are going, he'll probably be the developer when 'its ready'.
Steve
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78061
Author: Fishy_stink_ho
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 04:03
18 lines
1808 bytes
damn shame to walk away from all those sales.  they should sell it to
someone would actually make the damn thing

Ice
"Steve Long" <steve@ih8spam.yup> wrote in message
news:G2dUb.4$hJ6.1@fe01.usenetserver.com...
> Todd
> You be so right. That's why we call it 'vapor ware'.
> Like I alured to in a previous post, a friend of my wife was pregnant when
> the game was first mentioned, as coming 'soon'. The kid is in school now.
> The way things are going, he'll probably be the developer when 'its
ready'.
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78062
Author: Kent_Diego
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 05:05
7 lines
1352 bytes
I think this will be the year for DNF. I predict christmas 2004 we will be
playing the new coolest game of all time, beating Half-Life 2 and Doom 3
release.

There it is, my prediction set in stone.

-Kent
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78063
Author: Steve Long
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:17
11 lines
1533 bytes
SNIP> There it is, my prediction set in stone.
>
> -Kent
*********************************
Ah, you're going to put that on your headstone!
That will look nice.
I remember a similar prediction. A certain gaming store was taking
reservations for the game. It was 'guaranteed' to be out by
Christmas...1998.
Here's wishing you to be right.
Steve
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78064
Author: Georg Mildenberger
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:41
17 lines
1509 bytes
"Kent_Diego" <None@Nomicrosoft.com> wrote

> I think this will be the year for DNF. I predict christmas 2004
> we will be playing the new coolest game of all time, beating
> Half-Life 2 and Doom 3 release.
> 
> There it is, my prediction set in stone.

Halleluja! 
Say heil to the king brother!

Do you read this, George and all the other geniusses. Don´t let these 
untrusty critters disturb your prozess of creation!

The faithful will be given free copies!

Georg
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78065
Author: Fishy_stink_ho
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 03:52
23 lines
2372 bytes
I'm a big Duke fan. I always thought Duke was cooler than the space marine
or even freeman.  But this game is already irrelevant, never mind when hl2
and doom 3 come out.  Prove me wrong 3drealms.

"Georg Mildenberger" <georg.mildenberger@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:bvvk0c$10s6tq$1@ID-128215.news.uni-berlin.de...
> "Kent_Diego" <None@Nomicrosoft.com> wrote
>
> > I think this will be the year for DNF. I predict christmas 2004
> > we will be playing the new coolest game of all time, beating
> > Half-Life 2 and Doom 3 release.
> >
> > There it is, my prediction set in stone.
>
> Halleluja!
> Say heil to the king brother!
>
> Do you read this, George and all the other geniusses. Don´t let these
> untrusty critters disturb your prozess of creation!
>
> The faithful will be given free copies!
>
> Georg
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78066
Author: Larson, L.
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:22
24 lines
1844 bytes
Fishy_stink_ho wrote:

> damn shame to walk away from all those sales.  they should sell it to
> someone would actually make the damn thing
> 
> Ice
> "Steve Long" <steve@ih8spam.yup> wrote in message
> news:G2dUb.4$hJ6.1@fe01.usenetserver.com...
> 
>>Todd
>>You be so right. That's why we call it 'vapor ware'.
>>Like I alured to in a previous post, a friend of my wife was pregnant when
>>the game was first mentioned, as coming 'soon'. The kid is in school now.
>>The way things are going, he'll probably be the developer when 'its
> 
> ready'.
> 
>>Steve
>>

Some evil rumour has it that with the lots of exploding skyskrapers in 
the game it wouldn't be such a good idea to release it back then...

Well, but maybe they just f*ed up... ;)
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78067
Author: Tom Breton
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:34
18 lines
1569 bytes
"Larson, L." <larson.news.gorf@xoxy.net> writes:

[...]
> 
> Some evil rumour has it that with the lots of exploding skyskrapers in 
> the game it wouldn't be such a good idea to release it back then...

I like to think Duke players are made of sterner stuff than that.

 
> Well, but maybe they just f*ed up... ;)

If it was all done in 2001 but for some skyscrapers, I'd think it
would be out by now.  They could easily replace the skyscraper texture
if they had to.

-- 
Tom Breton, calm-eyed visionary
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78068
Author: Steve Long
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:17
10 lines
1601 bytes
SNIP> If it was all done in 2001 but for some skyscrapers, I'd think it
> would be out by now.  They could easily replace the skyscraper texture
> if they had to.
>
> --
> Tom Breton, calm-eyed visionary
******************************************
For whatever the reason, this vaporware has kept 3D Realms and Duke Nuken
fresh in the news. We're still talkin' about it ;-)
Steve
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78069
Author: Revoltix
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:36
17 lines
1905 bytes
Who really gives a shit? Just bring out the fuckin game >:(

"Steve Long" <steve@ih8spam.yup> wrote in message
news:zKTWb.609$ap.391@fe01.usenetserver.com...
> SNIP> If it was all done in 2001 but for some skyscrapers, I'd think it
> > would be out by now.  They could easily replace the skyscraper texture
> > if they had to.
> >
> > --
> > Tom Breton, calm-eyed visionary
> ******************************************
> For whatever the reason, this vaporware has kept 3D Realms and Duke Nuken
> fresh in the news. We're still talkin' about it ;-)
> Steve
>
>
>
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78070
Author: Todd
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 03:55
10 lines
1618 bytes
"Revoltix" <ihate@spam.com.au> wrote:

>Who really gives a shit? Just bring out the fuckin game >:(


Dude, have you been paying attention to the thread?

The game doesn't exist, never has existed, and may never exist.

Show me proof that it does.
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78071
Author: NutWrench
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:13
17 lines
1773 bytes
"Todd" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cvc540djd27n1cvoam7os0eamcsoe8pafq@4ax.com...
> "Revoltix" <ihate@spam.com.au> wrote:
>
> >Who really gives a shit? Just bring out the fuckin game >:(
>
>
> Dude, have you been paying attention to the thread?
>
> The game doesn't exist, never has existed, and may never exist.
>
> Show me proof that it does.
>

How about the 2001 E3 video? ;)
-- Nut
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78072
Author: Revoltix
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:28
27 lines
1984 bytes
Yeah, damn vicious ploy that is...




"NutWrench" <mrnutwrench@DETHB4SPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LyH0c.7498$ED1.2681@fe03.usenetserver.com...
>
> "Todd" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:cvc540djd27n1cvoam7os0eamcsoe8pafq@4ax.com...
> > "Revoltix" <ihate@spam.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > >Who really gives a shit? Just bring out the fuckin game >:(
> >
> >
> > Dude, have you been paying attention to the thread?
> >
> > The game doesn't exist, never has existed, and may never exist.
> >
> > Show me proof that it does.
> >
>
> How about the 2001 E3 video? ;)
> -- Nut
>
>
>
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78073
Author: Todd
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 05:49
19 lines
2212 bytes
I commented:

>> Dude, have you been paying attention to the thread?
>>
>> The game doesn't exist, never has existed, and may never exist.
>>
>> Show me proof that it does.

"NutWrench" <mrnut...@DETHB4SPAMhotmail.com> responded:

>How about the 2001 E3 video? ;)


Never saw it.  Was it possible it was simply a new map and skins for
an already existing game?

If there was actually a game being built at that time, it must have
been totally f-ed up for them to chuck the whole thing and restart on
a completely different engine.  Or only claim to restart.
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78074
Author: Bateau
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:54
124 lines
7240 bytes
     _.--""--._       On
   ."          ".     Sun, 07 Mar 2004 21:49:29 -0800
  | .   `      ` |    in
  \(            )/    alt.games.duke3d,
   \)__.    _._(/     Todd
   //   >..<   \\     spoke
   |__.' vv '.__/     22
      l'''"''l        lines
      \_    _/        to
 _      )--(     _    the
| '--.__)--(_.--' |   great
 \ |`----''----'| /   undead
  ||  `-'  '--' ||    skeleton
  || `--'  '--' ||    god
  |l `--'--'--' |l    of
 |__|`--'  `--'|__|   giant
 |  |    )-(   |  |   ascii
  ||     )-(    \||   who
  || __  )_(  __ \\   replied...
  ||'  `-   -'  \ \\
  ||\_   `-'   _/ |_\
 /_\ _)J-._.-L(   /`-\
|`- I_)O /\ O( `--l\\\|
||||( `-'  `-') .-' |||
 \\\ \       / /   ///
    \ \     / /
     \ \   / /
     /  \ /  \
     |_()I()._|
     \   /\   /
      | /  \ |
      | |   \ \
      | |    \ \
      | |     \ \
      | |-nabis\ \_
      | |      /-._\
     |.-.\    //.-._)
      \\\\   ///
       \\\\-'''
        ``''

>I commented:
>
>>> Dude, have you been paying attention to the thread?
>>>
>>> The game doesn't exist, never has existed, and may never exist.
>>>
>>> Show me proof that it does.
>
>"NutWrench" <mrnut...@DETHB4SPAMhotmail.com> responded:
>
>>How about the 2001 E3 video? ;)
>
>
>Never saw it.  Was it possible it was simply a new map and skins for
>an already existing game?
>
>If there was actually a game being built at that time, it must have
>been totally f-ed up for them to chuck the whole thing and restart on
>a completely different engine.  Or only claim to restart.

They probably got really behind and thought their game wouldn't sell
with an out of date engine. I don't think they have what it takes to
make a game that people will like these days anyway.
-- 
                     .-'`-.
                    / | |  \
                   /  | |   \
                  |___|_|__  |
                  ||<o>| <o>`|
                  ||   J_   )|
                  `|`-'__`-'|/
                   |  `--'  |
                 .-|        |_
              .-'  \     /  | |`-.
           .-'      `.     /| |   \
          /           ````' | |    \
         |_____             | |     L
      .-' ___   `-.         F F  |  |    ||`-.___
    .'.-'  |  `-.  `.      J J   /  |    ||    _.>
   / /|    |    |`.  \     | |   |/ |    ||_.-'
  / / |    |    |  `. `.   F F   |  |==============================
 J /  |    |    |    \  L J J    |  |      `:::::::.       `:::::::.
 FJ   |    |    |    |L J/ /     |   \       :::::::.        :::::::\
J |() | () | () | () | J L/      |   |        :::::::         :::::::L
| F   | .-'_ \  |    |  LJ       | /  L       ::::::::        :::::::J
| L   | /    \\ |    |  | L      |    |       ::::::::        ::::::::L
| L   ||     ):||    |  | |     /|     L      ::::::::        ::::::::|
J |   ||:._.'::||    |  | |----' |     |      ::::::::        ::::::::|     .---.
J |   |J:::::::||    |  | |    _/\     |      ::::::::        ::::::::|    /(@  o`.
 LJ   | \:::::/ |    |  | |---'\  |    |      ::::::::        ::::::::|   |    /^^^
 J L  |  `-:-'  |    |  | F  | \  |    J      ::::::::        ::::::::|    \ . \vvv
  LJ()| () | () | () |  F F  |  \  \--._L     ::::::::        ::::::::|     \ `--'
  J \ |    |    |    | J J     \    |  |      ::::::::        ::::::::|      \ `.
   \ \|    |    |    | / /    |     |  |      ::::::::        ::::::::|       L  \
    \ \    |    |    |/ /|     |    | .-'|    ::::::::        ::::::::|       |   \
     `.`.  |    |   .'.' |     |    |/ /`L    ::::::::        ::::::::|       |    L
     | `.`-.____|.-'.-'  |     |    | <`. \   ::::::::        ::::::::|       |    |
     | | `-.______.-'    |    \|    |_`::\ `. ::::::::        ::::::::|       F    |
     | J\ |  |           |     |    /:  \::. \::::::::        ::::::::F      /     |
     |  L\|--|           |     _.--|::   `::\ `.::::::       .:::::::J      /      F
     J  J |\\|-.____     |__.-'    |:      \::. \::::        ::::::::F    .'      J
      L  \| >||      `--' J        |'      .`::\ `.:'      .::::::::/   .'        F
      J   |//JJ        |   L       |---.   .--\::. \---.   .---.   <---<         J
       L  |< |J        |\=/|       ( _  \=/  _ `::\ `.  \=/  _  \=/  _  \       /
       J  |\\|J        | | /        )_)  |  (_)  \::. \  |  (_)  |  (_)  |     /
        \ |--|J        |//\\       /    //\     //`::\ `./\     //\     /    .'
         \|  |L `      )/  )` `' '|`---//  `---//  `\::. \ `---//  `---'   .'
VK________|  L_\    '  /___/ ' |  |___//______//_____`::\ |___//_________.'_________
          F  F J``  -'|    | | |  |                    \:_|
          `-'  | ""   |    J `    |
               |      |     L     |          |\    |\          /|   /| |\     /|
               |      |     \     |          | \   | \        //   //  | \    ||  |\
               J      |      `.   |          ||\\  ||\\      //   //   ||\\   ||  ||
                L     F       )`---\         || >> || \\    / |  <<    || \\  ||  ||
                |    J        /     `.       ||//  ||  ||  //||   \\   ||  || ||  ||
                J    J       (        `-.    |//   | \ || |/ ||    \\  | \ || ||  ||
                `-.__/       `---.       `.  |<<   ||\\||    ||     >> ||\\|| ||  ||
                |   J             `.       ) ||\\  || \ |    ||    //  || \ | ||  ||
                /   |               `-----'  || >> ||  ||    ||   //   ||  ||  \\ ||
               /    F                        ||//  ||  ||    ||  <<    ||  ||   \\||
              J    J                         | /   |/  ||    |/   \\   |/  ||    \ |
              J    |                         |/        \|          \|      \|     \|
               `-.-'                         K I N G   O F   T H E   M O N S T E R S
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78075
Author: bk... Raymond Martineau
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 03:20
35 lines
2629 bytes
On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 21:49:29 -0800, Todd <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:

>I commented:
>
>>> Dude, have you been paying attention to the thread?
>>>
>>> The game doesn't exist, never has existed, and may never exist.
>>>
>>> Show me proof that it does.
>
>"NutWrench" <mrnut...@DETHB4SPAMhotmail.com> responded:
>
>>How about the 2001 E3 video? ;)
>
>
>Never saw it.  Was it possible it was simply a new map and skins for
>an already existing game?

I'm not exactly sure myself, but from what I saw, they appear to have been
developing their own rendering engine at one time.  Before that, they have
been purchasing license(s) for the Quake and Unreal engines as a graphics
platform ($1 million down the drain.)

>
>If there was actually a game being built at that time, it must have
>been totally f-ed up for them to chuck the whole thing and restart on
>a completely different engine.  Or only claim to restart.
>

Dn4F is following the footsteps of Daikatana.  In both of these cases, the
problem with the game development isn't bottlenecked around an engine, but
rather around the gameplay design itself... or something.

The only difference between those two games is that Daikatana is actually
out.  
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78076
Author: NutWrench
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:51
18 lines
2040 bytes
"Todd" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:622o4095h81r1fifponnd3hudcb2h2if7p@4ax.com...
>
> Never saw it.  Was it possible it was simply a new map and skins for
> an already existing game?
>
> If there was actually a game being built at that time, it must have
> been totally f-ed up for them to chuck the whole thing and restart on
> a completely different engine.  Or only claim to restart.
>
>

Why don't you download it and see for yourself?
It kicks ass. And keep in mind that it's 3 years old when you watch it. :)
http://www.3dgamers.com/games/duke4ever/

--Nut
Re: Duke Nukem Forever Farce
#78077
Author: Georg Mildenberger
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:37
28 lines
2002 bytes
"NutWrench" <mrnut...@DETHB4SPAMhotmail.com> wrote

> 
> "Todd" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:622o4095h81r1fifponnd3hudcb2h2if7p@4ax.com...
>>
>> Never saw it.  Was it possible it was simply a new map and
>> skins for an already existing game?
>>
>> If there was actually a game being built at that time, it must
>> have been totally f-ed up for them to chuck the whole thing and
>> restart on a completely different engine.  Or only claim to
>> restart. 
>>
>>
> 
> Why don't you download it and see for yourself?
> It kicks ass. And keep in mind that it's 3 years old when you
> watch it. :) http://www.3dgamers.com/games/duke4ever/
> 
> --Nut

Halleluja brother!
The unwashed unfaithful whimps will be damned to to play "The 
Sims" in eternity!
We, the true believers will be given free copies of duke4ever!

Schorsch
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads