🚀 go-pugleaf

STOP ALL THIS SPAMMING  NOW. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THESE
NEWSGROUPS.

On Sun, 17 Aug 1997 09:32:48 GMT, rab...@mindspring.com (rabBit)
wrote:

>
>>>Heh i would like to see a case like this.  No damn lawyers could argue with
>>>this one.
>
>>actually - in about half of the states in the US you are guilty of
>>murder if you shoot someone EVEN IF they are stealing on your
>>property. seems the lawyers were able to argue it after all..........
>
>
>>BBW
>
>That's funny. Last time I read the Bill of Rights, which is a FEDERALY
>RECOGNIZED CODE OF RIGHTS (i.e., state laws cannot effect or otherwise
>violate these rights) it states that a person has the "Right to use
>deadly force if deadly force is brought to bear against him, for
>protection of ones self, for the protection of ones properties or
>lands, and all possessions therein."
>
>If you don't have a No Tresspassing sign up, then you can't do a damn
>thing unless you warn the tresspassers first. But my sign is up, and
>it is quite clear. Trust me, I investigated my rights before I put the
>sign up. Step on my land, get a bullet through the head, and I call
>the police, they take you away, and if you survive, I prosecute YOU.
>
>Isn't America grand?
>
>
>rabBit
>Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail sent to this address will result 
>in either a mailbomb campaign or a virial attack, depending upon
>the nature of the offending E-mail and my mood. By sending E-mail
>to this address, you agree to these terms. 
>