🚀 go-pugleaf

STOP ALL THIS SPAMMING  NOW. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THESE
NEWSGROUPS.

On Sun, 17 Aug 1997 16:17:34 GMT, big_bad@mindspring..com (Big Bad
Wolf) wrote:

>On Sun, 17 Aug 1997 09:32:48 GMT, rab...@mindspring.com (rabBit)
>wrote:
>
>>
>>>>Heh i would like to see a case like this.  No damn lawyers could argue with
>>>>this one.
>>
>>>actually - in about half of the states in the US you are guilty of
>>>murder if you shoot someone EVEN IF they are stealing on your
>>>property. seems the lawyers were able to argue it after all..........
>>
>>
>>>BBW
>>
>>That's funny. Last time I read the Bill of Rights, which is a FEDERALY
>>RECOGNIZED CODE OF RIGHTS (i.e., state laws cannot effect or otherwise
>>violate these rights) it states that a person has the "Right to use
>>deadly force if deadly force is brought to bear against him, for
>>protection of ones self, for the protection of ones properties or
>>lands, and all possessions therein."
>>
>>If you don't have a No Tresspassing sign up, then you can't do a damn
>>thing unless you warn the tresspassers first. But my sign is up, and
>>it is quite clear. Trust me, I investigated my rights before I put the
>>sign up. Step on my land, get a bullet through the head, and I call
>>the police, they take you away, and if you survive, I prosecute YOU.
>>
>>Isn't America grand?
>>
>this isnt American law that gives you that right - that is if you have
>legally informed that you actually have it instead of just inferring
>it from your interpretation of the law. the laws which give or dont
>give you this right are state laws and even if your state has this law
>- my state and many others have the opposite law. the belief that
>everyone has this right is a pop ular - though highly erroneous one.
>this doesnt mean however that i am willing to come to your house and
>get shot to prove my point - much as you wish i would =].
>
>
>BBW