Article View: alt.games.doom
Article #93913Re: How does the "eye candy" of the ATI 9800Pro compare to that of an ATI 9600XT?
From: Augustus
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:29
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:29
22 lines
2210 bytes
2210 bytes
"Glitch" <glitch_120@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:dibatf$5u7$1@bagan.srce.hr... > jingram wrote: > /cut/ > > First of al, the 9800Pro is an old card and even if you find one for sale > it's not advisable to buy it.The best thing you could get for that money > is a nVidia 6600GT or a ATI X700Pro. > However the best bang for the buck today is the X800 or X800GT. > In any case 9800Pro would be an upgrade toy our 9600XT but I wouldn't > advise you to buy it. Yeah, that really answers his question. The "old" 9800 Pro's visuals look identical to a 9600XT. They're both decent DX9 cards, but the 9600XT lags behind in framerates and throughput. By about 30-40%. The "old" 9800 Pro is just fine for most any new game, so long as you don't require resolutions greater than 1024x768 with options on, it'll do fine. There's no real performance difference to speak of between a 6600GT or X700 Pro until you go above 1024x768 and turning on FSAA and AF. All are modern DX9 cards. None support Pixel Shader 3.0. So getting an X700Pro thinking the visuals or eye candy will be any different is just wrong.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bAb2f.19567$ir4.455@edtnps90>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.octanews.net!teal.octanews.net!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps90.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<diba2j$eor9$1@news3.infoave.net> <dibatf$5u7$1@bagan.srce.hr>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.octanews.net!teal.octanews.net!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps90.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Augustus" <augustus@wrtt.net> Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati, alt.games.doom, alt.games.need-for-speed, alt.games.unreal.tournament2003 References: <diba2j$eor9$1@news3.infoave.net> <dibatf$5u7$1@bagan.srce.hr> Subject: Re: How does the "eye candy" of the ATI 9800Pro compare to that of an ATI 9600XT? Lines: 24 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-ID: <bAb2f.19567$ir4.455@edtnps90> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:29:59 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.206.48.92 X-Trace: edtnps90 1128875399 205.206.48.92 (Sun, 09 Oct 2005 10:29:59 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 10:29:59 MDT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit