Article View: alt.games.doom
Article #93816Re: Doom3 with A64 X2 not what I hoped...
From: Inglo
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:39
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:39
55 lines
3307 bytes
3307 bytes
On 8/23/2005 3:48 AM McGrandpa brightened our day with: >"Scott Amspoker" <see_sig@nospam.com> wrote in message >news:61blg11fekk8kk92eq37cq9a1uk4urhei8@4ax.com... > > >>"McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>>"Scott Amspoker" <see_sig@nospam.com> wrote in message >>>news:m4tkg1lq3266mfgtrq4vroeactndd63c43@4ax.com... >>> >>> >>>>"McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Far Cry 32 bit won't even load under XP x64. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Oh wonderful. Now why would that be the case? I guess I better >>>>download >>>>the x64 version of FarCry now so I'll have it when I eventually upgrade. >>>> >>>> >>>Well, I already upgraded :) And I just HAD to try that one out! >>>it was worth the dl and the trouble! >>> >>> >>I have no doubt that 64-bit FarCry is great under x64. I'm just >>disappointed that the 32-bit version breaks under x64. It shouldn't. My >>guess is that the fault is Crytek's. >> >> > >Well, I installed Far Cry, and the only patch I put on it was the x64. So >it's likely it won't work at all as 32 bit. I can go install it fresh as 32 >bit and patch it to 1.32 and it will likely work under x64. If I want to >play it in XP Pro 32 bit, I'll have to install it again, seperate from the >64 bit install. which I'll do as soon as I have time, like this weekend :) >McG. > What's the problem? I don't understand why once you've got a 64 bit processor you'd want to play the 32 bit version. What's preferable about the 32 bit version? Are you running 32 bit Windows still or in your buying frenzy did you pick up an oem copy of XP Pro 64 bit? Looks like Microsoft lets you download a trial version. Wonder what the heck that is. -- "I don't feel tardy" Steve ¤»Inglo«¤ www.inglostadt.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<EqHOe.216$5k1.26@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!24fa0c20!not-for-mailReferences:
<b49Oe.162028$0f.59201@tornado.texas.rr.com> <m4tkg1lq3266mfgtrq4vroeactndd63c43@4ax.com> <wCwOe.237126$X76.6647@tornado.texas.rr.com> <61blg11fekk8kk92eq37cq9a1uk4urhei8@4ax.com> <daDOe.148684$gL1.134680@tornado.texas.rr.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.POSTED!24fa0c20!not-for-mail From: Inglo <ioo@??.żżż> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: alt.games.doom Subject: Re: Doom3 with A64 X2 not what I hoped... References: <b49Oe.162028$0f.59201@tornado.texas.rr.com> <m4tkg1lq3266mfgtrq4vroeactndd63c43@4ax.com> <wCwOe.237126$X76.6647@tornado.texas.rr.com> <61blg11fekk8kk92eq37cq9a1uk4urhei8@4ax.com> <daDOe.148684$gL1.134680@tornado.texas.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <daDOe.148684$gL1.134680@tornado.texas.rr.com> Lines: 55 Message-ID: <EqHOe.216$5k1.26@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.121.88.89 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr27.news.prodigy.net 1124811556 ST000 67.121.88.89 (Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:39:16 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:39:16 EDT Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: T[OUSUJOEBTUGQPP^Z_TO_@JEX_FRMLMA@TLOCYLJZ]BGIELDVW[AKK[J\]^HVKHG^EWZHBLO^[\NH_AZFWGN^\DHNVMX_DHHX[FSQKBOTS@@BP^]C@RHS_AGDDC[AJM_T[GZNRNZAY]GNCPBDYKOLK^_CZFWPGHZIXW@C[AFKBBQS@E@DAZ]VDFUNTQQ]FN Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:39:16 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit