🚀 go-pugleaf

"Scott Amspoker" <see_sig@nospam.com> wrote in message 
news:61blg11fekk8kk92eq37cq9a1uk4urhei8@4ax.com...
> "McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Scott Amspoker" <see_sig@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>news:m4tkg1lq3266mfgtrq4vroeactndd63c43@4ax.com...
>>> "McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Far Cry 32 bit won't even load under XP x64.
>>>
>>> Oh wonderful.  Now why would that be the case?  I guess I better 
>>> download
>>> the x64 version of FarCry now so I'll have it when I eventually upgrade.
>>
>>Well, I already upgraded :)  And I just HAD to try that one out!
>>it was worth the dl and the trouble!
>
> I have no doubt that 64-bit FarCry is great under x64.  I'm just
> disappointed that the 32-bit version breaks under x64.  It shouldn't.  My
> guess is that the fault is Crytek's.

Well, I installed Far Cry, and the only patch I put on it was the x64.  So 
it's likely it won't work at all as 32 bit.  I can go install it fresh as 32 
bit and patch it to 1.32 and it will likely work under x64.  If I want to 
play it in XP Pro 32 bit, I'll have to install it again, seperate from the 
64 bit install.  which I'll do as soon as I have time, like this weekend :)
McG.
>
>
> -- 
> sda_mail         Scott        |  Yields over 30 blasts or
> @comcast.net     Amspoker     |  80 gentle honks per charge!
> ^ my email                    |