🚀 go-pugleaf

"McGrandpa" <McGrandpaNOT@NOThotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uaORc.12417$rb2.1108@fe2.texas.rr.com...
> Michael-NC wrote:
> > OK, D3 is an extension of D1 and it's just what Id wanted huh? How
> > the hell you can argue that when you compare what Q2 was to Q1 and
> > what Q3 was and still is to Q2 is beyond me. Id laid a giant egg, the
> > game is a steaming pile of dung and that's why it's being soundly
> > trashed on boards from coast to coast. There has never been a more
> > highly anticipated and wildly hyped title from a major developer that
> > has sucked so bad as D3. While they were screwing around with this
> > game for years, other titles, such as Farcry and Painkiller have
> > shown us the future of the FPS and Id is sucking wind. How the mighty
> > have fallen...
>
> I recall hearing sounds very like you're making when iD released Quake.
> Then Quake2.  Then Quake3.  There is always something 'wrong' and there
> is always somebody to pound it in.  Were you in a.g.q back then?  Sure
> sounds familiar.

I don't recall any of the sort regarding the Quake franchise. How do you
think that Id rose to such great heights and spawned such anticipation of
it's works? I've never seen an Id offering so roundly flogged but it richly
deserves it. The type of criticism the game is receiving is dam near
universal and uniform in nature and if it walks like a duck...

> Look, I've read a lot of your posts the last couple days.  Tried to talk
> with you about hardware stuff

Excuse me? You haven't "tried to talk" with me at all and if you insist that
you have, you're nothing more than a lair. I read several of _your_ posts,
which were rife with old, outdated information and outright misinformation
and I corrected you. No "talk" was involved as you didn't bother offering a
rebuttal for your incorrect positions. I've been on Usenet for many, many
years and just dropped by this group to see if anyone hated the game as much
as I did. In the course of that discovery I saw your posts and you
immediately struck me as another pompous know-nothing who populates these
software sites and offers themselves as some kind of hard ware guru when in
actuality, you don't know what the hell you're talking about. This fact is
already indisputable, as I rebutted everyone of your wild claims in another
post on this board so you better reign yourself in and go talk to someone
else.

> now about Doom3 itself a bit.

That wasn't talking, that was you letting your self-inflated ego out to
play, now you could kiss my ass cowboy.


>Through
> all of this, you come off as if you're angry.  You seemed to put effort
> into getting others on the defensive.  If you'd like a good
> conversation, great.  You can have better than you're getting, I'll
> assure you of that.
> Michael McCollum

Gee, thanks cowboy but I don't need to rely on Usenet for conversation...

Good Day!