🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: alt.games.diablo
94 messages
94 total messages Page 2 of 2 Started by flaviaR Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:25
Page 2 of 2 • 94 total messages
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542023
Author: flaviaR
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:36
14 lines
1593 bytes
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:53:49 -0400, xpenenyx@earthlink.net wrote:

>On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:25:47 GMT, flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
>
>>I have now killfiled myself so I don;t have to read the illiterate
>>lies posted by the forging bgot(s).
>
>It would be much better if you killed yourself instead you forging
>idiot!

I agree w/you.  This ng & the world in general would be better off
w/out the projecting bgot.

Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542022
Author: flaviaR
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:37
29 lines
1742 bytes
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:03:36 GMT, Obviously NOT flaviaR@verizon.net
wrote:

>
>On  3-Oct-2007, Bryn <Scotland-the-Brave@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>> >I have now killfiled myself so I don;t have to read the illiterate
>> >lies posted by the forging bgot(s).
>> >
>> >the stupid phony rev
>>
>> It is?
>>
>> flavia18@verizion.net
>>
>> (Sorry! Couldn't resist.!
>
>No need to apologize for mocking a forger!

Uh-huh.  

>Nice catch (not that it was difficult, of course....)
>
>NOT Susan

Good grief!  Just when the bgot couldn;t get *more* projectionist.

Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542021
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:53
62 lines
3186 bytes
<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message 
news:4709b363.343078843@news.tiscali.co.uk...
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:33:17 +0100, Bryn
> <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>>
>>>On  3-Oct-2007, Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> 
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>>> >On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:47:03 +0100, Bryn
>>>> ><Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>>> >>>I have now killfiled myself so I don;t have to read the illiterate
>>>> >>>lies posted by the forging bgot(s).
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Susan
>>>> >>
>>>> >>It is?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>flav...@verizion.net
>>>> >>
>>>> >>(Sorry! Couldn't resist.!
>>>> >
>>>> >No, Brys, it;s [sic] *verizon.net*.
>>>> >
>>>> >Susan
>>>>
>>>> Darn...!
>>>
>>>Yes, the forger was glad to have caught you in a typo.
>>>He likes to pretend it means someone is mentally ill.
>>>>
>>>> BTW
>>>>
>>>> Forgers are in my opinion the lowest and most cowardly scum on 
>>>> Usenet...
>>>> >
>>>
>>>Yes, & the forger to whom you replied fits that bill.
>>>
>>>Please remove alt.games diablo & alt.gossip.royalty from any thread he
>>>infests:
>>
>>Will do...
>>>he likes to terrorise those groups, and their inclusion in any thread 
>>>means
>>>that
>>>he is forging.
>>>
>>>Susan
>>
>>That was no typo... and he missed it...
>>
>>veri(zion).net Geddit... Hence the sorry...
>
> Oh, I see,  you;re just another jewhating bgot.

He doesn't seem to be terribly fond of thick Irish cunts either.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541984
Author: Bryn
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:44
21 lines
1662 bytes
Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>
>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Bryn
>>
>
>Bit thich isn't she?

She used to be fun....
>

-- 
Bryn

To the Phenomenonologist,
legend is an artefact.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542015
Author: fla...
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:31
18 lines
1524 bytes
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:56:24 -0500, "S�im� mac Liam"
<gwy...@comcast.nospam.net> wrote:

>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in 
>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>
>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>
>> 
>> -- 
>> Bryn
>> 
>
>Bit thich (sic)  isn't she?

The illiterate bgot is projecting.

Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541985
Author: fla...
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:31
21 lines
1655 bytes
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:44:39 +0100, Bryn
<Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:

>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>
>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bryn
>>>
>>
>>Bit thich isn't she?
>
>She used to be fun....

Not that the sexist bgot can prove, of course.

Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542019
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:55
27 lines
2122 bytes
"Séimí mac Liam" <gwy...@comcast.nospam.net> wrote in message 
news:Xns99C35B4722E4CSim@216.196.97.136...
> Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
> news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>
>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Bryn
>>
>
> Bit thich isn't she?

It's known as the "dyslexic, thick Irish cunt."  Apologies to the Irish.



>
> -- 
> Saint Séimí mac Liam
> Carriagemaker to the  court of Queen Maeve
> Prophet of The Great Tagger
> Canonized December '99
>
> 
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541987
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:56
19 lines
2063 bytes
"Bryn" <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:93OImbJHymCHFwSZ@finhall.demon.co.uk...
> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>
>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bryn
>>>
>>
>>Bit thich isn't she?
>
> She used to be fun....

And then it got circumcised.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542020
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 12:14
23 lines
2180 bytes
<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message news:N%JOi.4559$44.4401@trnddc04...
>
> On  8-Oct-2007, "Séimí mac Liam" <gwy...@comcast.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>> Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>> news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>
>> > Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>> >>
>> >
>> > -- 
>> > Bryn
>> >
>>
>> Bit thich isn't she?
>
> You can't pass the phony rev off oonto us - he not a
> man, but he's definitely "male" in the medical sense.

"oonto?"  "he not a man?"

None of that made a word of sense, you stupid, dyslexic, thick Irish cunt.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541989
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 12:16
29 lines
2229 bytes
<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message news:x0KOi.4560$44.347@trnddc04...
>
> On  8-Oct-2007, Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> 
> wrote:
>
>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>> >Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>> >news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>> >
>> >> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Bryn
>> >>
>> >
>> >Bit thich isn't she?
>>
>> She used to be fun....
>
> I am forced to disagree on both count: the forging bigot was never
> fun, and he's definiutely not female, even if he is effeminate.

"Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both" 
shoudl be "counts."

"definiutely?"  What the fuck is that meant to articulate, you dyslexic, 
thick Irish cunt?
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542016
Author: Séimí mac Liam
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:33
29 lines
2177 bytes
fla...@verizon.net wrote in news:470b1f...@news.tiscali.co.uk:

> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:56:24 -0500, "S�im� mac Liam"
> <gwy...@comcast.nospam.net> wrote:
> 
>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in 
>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>
>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Bryn
>>> 
>>
>>Bit thich (sic)  isn't she?
> 
> The illiterate bgot is projecting.
> 
> Susan

Wat's a bgot when it's at home?
(don't you hate it when that happens?)

-- 
Saint S�im� mac Liam 
Carriagemaker to the  court of Queen Maeve 
Prophet of The Great Tagger 
Canonized December '99 
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542017
Author: fla...
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:38
30 lines
1975 bytes
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:33:46 -0500, "S�im� mac Liam"
<gwy...@comcast.nospam.net> wrote:

>fla...@verizon.net wrote in news:470b1f...@news.tiscali.co.uk:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:56:24 -0500, "S�im� mac Liam"
>> <gwy...@comcast.nospam.net> wrote:
>> 
>>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in 
>>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>>
>>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Bryn
>>>> 
>>>
>>>Bit thich (sic)  isn't she?
>> 
>> The illiterate bgot is projecting.
>> 
>> Susan
>
>Wat's (sic) a bgot when it's at home?
>(don't you hate it when that happens?)

Anyone who hates us jews is a bgot.  And what;s a "wat"?

Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541983
Author: Gwyneð Bennetdottir
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:08
9 lines
1565 bytes
On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
wrote:

> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both"
> shoudl be....

"Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?

Shucks.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542018
Author: Séimí mac Liam
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:28
43 lines
2581 bytes
fla...@verizon.net wrote in news:470b9...@news.tiscali.co.uk:

> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:33:46 -0500, "S�im� mac Liam"
> <gwy...@comcast.nospam.net> wrote:
> 
>>fla...@verizon.net wrote in news:470b1ff7.436411265
@news.tiscali.co.uk:
>>
>>> On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:56:24 -0500, "S�im� mac Liam"
>>> <gwy...@comcast.nospam.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in 
>>>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Bryn
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>Bit thich (sic)  isn't she?
>>> 
>>> The illiterate bgot is projecting.
>>> 
>>> Susan
>>
>>Wat's (sic) a bgot when it's at home?
>>(don't you hate it when that happens?)
> 
> Anyone who hates us jews is a bgot.  And what;s a "wat"?
> 
> Susan
> 
> 

vernacular

-- 
Saint S�im� mac Liam 
Carriagemaker to the  court of Queen Maeve 
Prophet of The Great Tagger 
Canonized December '99 
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542006
Author: fla...
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:24
38 lines
1984 bytes
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:57:17 GMT, Obviously NOT fla...@verizon.net
but a forging scumbag bgot  wrote:

>
>On  8-Oct-2007, Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>> >Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>> >news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>> >
>> >> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Bryn
>> >>
>> >
>> >Bit thich isn't she?
>>
>> She used to be fun....
>
>I am forced to disagree on both count (sic):

Uh-huh.  The bgot thinks his forgeries gain credibility by mimicking
my dyslexia.

> the forging bigot was never
>fun, and he's definiutely (sic) not female, even if he is effeminate.

mimicking #2.

>(Take agr & agd out of the thread - don't help him spam!)

Why is the forger spamming soc.culture.scottish?

Susan

>NOT Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541994
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:20
18 lines
1988 bytes
"Gwyneð Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1191942538.115419.23530@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> wrote:
>
>> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both"
>> shoudl be....
>
> "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?

Gotta give you something to work with.


>
> Shucks.
>
> 
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542007
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:21
31 lines
2268 bytes
<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message 
news:470c620c.62830125@news.tiscali.co.uk...
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:57:17 GMT, Obviously NOT fla...@verizon.net
> but a forging scumbag bgot  wrote:
>
>>
>>On  8-Oct-2007, Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> 
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>> >Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>> >news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>> >
>>> >> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Bryn
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Bit thich isn't she?
>>>
>>> She used to be fun....
>>
>>I am forced to disagree on both count (sic):
>
> Uh-huh.  The bgot thinks his forgeries gain credibility by mimicking
> my dyslexia.

It's such an easy thing to do, cohen.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542008
Author: Bryn
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:32
47 lines
2383 bytes
Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:57:17 GMT, Obviously NOT fla...@verizon.net
>but a forging scumbag bgot  wrote:
>
>>
>>On  8-Oct-2007, Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>> >Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>> >news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>> >
>>> >> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Bryn
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Bit thich isn't she?
>>>
>>> She used to be fun....
>>
>>I am forced to disagree on both count (sic):
>
>Uh-huh.  The bgot thinks his forgeries gain credibility by mimicking
>my dyslexia.
>
>> the forging bigot was never
>>fun, and he's definiutely (sic) not female, even if he is effeminate.
>
>mimicking #2.
>
>>(Take agr & agd out of the thread - don't help him spam!)
>
>Why is the forger spamming soc.culture.scottish?
>
We're famously territorial. I think somebody is trying to start a 
bun-fight.

Too bad! We don't throw good food around.
>

-- 
Bryn

To the Phenomenonologist,
legend is an artefact.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541996
Author: Gwyneð Bennetdottir
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:10
17 lines
1976 bytes
On Oct 10, 2:20 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
wrote:
> "Gwyneð Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1191942538.115419.23530@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> > wrote:
>
> >> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both"
> >> shoudl be....
>
> > "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>
> Gotta give you something to work with.

Your mistake wasn't intentional.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541997
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:32
26 lines
2538 bytes
"Gwyneð Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1192011057.900582.102230@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 10, 2:20 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
wrote:
> "Gwyneð Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1191942538.115419.23530@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> > wrote:
>
> >> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following 
> >> "both"
> >> shoudl be....
>
> > "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>
> Gotta give you something to work with.

>Your mistake wasn't intentional.

Not that you can prove, cloth-ears.

Are you a yid Gwennie? You show evidence of possessing any number of their 
rather unusal traits. Lying, delusion, deceit, fuckwittery - It's all there.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541998
Author: Gwyneð Bennetdottir
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:39
27 lines
2346 bytes
On Oct 10, 5:32 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
wrote:
> "Gwyne? Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1192011057.900582.102230@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 10, 2:20 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> wrote:
>
> > "Gwyne? Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:1191942538.115419.23530@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> > > wrote:
>
> > >> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following
> > >> "both"
> > >> shoudl be....
>
> > > "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>
> > Gotta give you something to work with.
> >Your mistake wasn't intentional.
>
> Not...

It was.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541999
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:46
32 lines
2777 bytes
"Gwyneð Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1192012789.698751.209140@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 10, 5:32 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
wrote:
> "Gwyneð Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1192011057.900582.102230@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 10, 2:20 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> wrote:
>
> > "Gwyneð Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:1191942538.115419.23530@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> > > wrote:
>
> > >> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following
> > >> "both"
> > >> shoudl be....
>
> > > "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>
> > Gotta give you something to work with.
> >Your mistake wasn't intentional.
>
> Not...

>It was.

Que? What the fuck are you blathering about, you dull-witted shit?
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541991
Author: The Rebberend
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:43
13 lines
1718 bytes
On Oct 9, 4:08 pm, Gwyneð Bennetdottir <bennetw...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> wrote:
>
> > "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both"
> > shoudl be....
>
> "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>
> Shucks.

"Shucks"?  It should be fucks, shouldn't it?
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542009
Author: fla...
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:46
48 lines
2537 bytes
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:32:11 +0100, Bryn
<Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:

>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:57:17 GMT, Obviously NOT fla...@verizon.net
>>but a forging scumbag bgot  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>On  8-Oct-2007, Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>>> >Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>>> >news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Bryn
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Bit thich isn't she?
>>>>
>>>> She used to be fun....
>>>
>>>I am forced to disagree on both count (sic):
>>
>>Uh-huh.  The bgot thinks his forgeries gain credibility by mimicking
>>my dyslexia.
>>
>>> the forging bigot was never
>>>fun, and he's definiutely (sic) not female, even if he is effeminate.
>>
>>mimicking #2.
>>
>>>(Take agr & agd out of the thread - don't help him spam!)
>>
>>Why is the forger spamming soc.culture.scottish?
>>
>We're famously territorial. I think somebody is trying to start a 
>bun-fight.
>
>Too bad! We don't throw good food around.

You don;t have good food.  You have fried Mars bars & other
cardiac-inducing shit.

Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541992
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:13
18 lines
2166 bytes
"The Rebberend" <abu...@googlemail.com> wrote in message 
news:1192016610.094424.178740@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 9, 4:08 pm, Gwyneð Bennetdottir <bennetw...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> wrote:
>
> > "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both"
> > shoudl be....
>
> "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>
> Shucks.

"Shucks"?  It should be fucks, shouldn't it?

This thing seems to be a cohen clone. Scary thought.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542000
Author: RJ11
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:24
17 lines
1687 bytes
In article <ltGdnYp5eqLvN5Ha...@giganews.com>,
B'enjamin C'ramer <onlytetruth@alltimes.yo> wrote:

   (hysterical rants given the snip)

   Do calm down,  "Cramer".  Soon,  your little brother will arrive
with the new shipment,  and everything will be fine.

   "my younger Brother got me absolutely stoned on magic mushrooms.
I spent three days sitting in the corner of the tent waiting to come
down." -- the neo-Nazi "Ben Cramer" reflects on his usage of
hallucinatory drugs.  Source:
Message-ID: <1125123267.5e5d281ad88798917af26011bcb01dc0@teranews>

   There you go.  That's a good lad.

RJ.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542002
Author: fla...
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:29
27 lines
1769 bytes
On 10-Oct-2007, =?iso-8859-1?q?Gwyne=F0_Bennetdottir?=
<bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 10, 2:20 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> wrote:
> > "Gwyne� Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:1191942538.115419.23530@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following
> > >> "both"
> > >> shoudl be....
> >
> > > "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
> >
> > Gotta give you something to work with.
>
> Your mistake wasn't intentional.

They never are.
But note how easily the lie comes to him?

Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542003
Author: B'enjamin C'ramer
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:33
33 lines
2511 bytes
<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message news:%s4Pi.4321$d2.3153@trnddc08...
>
> On 10-Oct-2007, =?iso-8859-1?q?Gwyne=F0_Bennetdottir?=
> <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 10, 2:20 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
>> wrote:
>> > "Gwyneð Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> >
>> > news:1191942538.115419.23530@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > > On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > >> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following
>> > >> "both"
>> > >> shoudl be....
>> >
>> > > "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>> >
>> > Gotta give you something to work with.
>>
>> Your mistake wasn't intentional.
>
> They never are.
> But note how easily the lie comes to him?

No lie my end, you lying, dyslexic, thick Irish cunt.

Why do you continue posting, cohen. You get your gormy head kicked in by goy 
and yid alike, yet you continue. Does the masochistic tendency come with the 
Konversion and the race change?
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541993
Author: The Rebberend
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 06:04
22 lines
2285 bytes
On Oct 10, 3:52 pm, Gwyneð <gwen.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 10, 6:43 am, The Rebberend <abus...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 9, 4:08 pm, Gwyneð Bennetdottir <bennetwitho...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both"
> > > > shoudl be....
>
> > > "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>
> > > Shucks.
>
> > "Shucks"?
>
> It's better than your proposed "fuck," Something you wish you had in
> quantity.

Go play with your clit (if any), lesbo.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541990
Author: The Rebberend
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:32
34 lines
2501 bytes
On Oct 11, 12:08 pm, Gwyneð Bennetdottir <bennet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 11, 1:04 am, The Rebberend <abus...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 10, 3:52 pm, Gwyneð <gwen.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 10, 6:43 am, The Rebberend <abus...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 9, 4:08 pm, Gwyneð Bennetdottir <bennetwitho...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both"
> > > > > > shoudl be....
>
> > > > > "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>
> > > > > Shucks.
>
> > > > "Shucks"?
>
> > > It's better than your proposed "fuck," Something you wish you had in
> > > quantity.
>
> > Go play...
>
> Go die, bigot.

Go fuck yourself, lesbo.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542011
Author: The Highlander
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:08
25 lines
1905 bytes
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:44:39 +0100, Bryn
<Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:

>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>
>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bryn
>>>
>>
>>Bit thich isn't she?
>
>She used to be fun....
>>

You should be aware that many of Susan's responses are actually
forgeries committed by Cramer. You shoulkd instead turn him in to his
IP and have his postimng priveleges cancelled. He's not even amusing;
he's simply becoming more and more pathetic with every post.

I think it's time to stab him in the back.  
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541986
Author: The Highlander
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:11
25 lines
1835 bytes
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 06:31:26 GMT, fla...@verizon.net wrote:

>On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:44:39 +0100, Bryn
><Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>>
>>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bryn
>>>>
>>>
>>>Bit thich isn't she?
>>
>>She used to be fun....
>
>Not that the sexist bgot can prove, of course.
>
>Susan

This message was posted by Posting-Host: 80.225.148.210 - Cramer. 
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541988
Author: The Highlander
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:12
24 lines
1817 bytes
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:56:19 +1000, "B'enjamin C'ramer"
<onlytetruth@alltimes.yo> wrote:

>
>"Bryn" <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in message 
>news:93OImbJHymCHFwSZ@finhall.demon.co.uk...
>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>>
>>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bryn
>>>>
>>>
>>>Bit thich isn't she?
>>
>> She used to be fun....
>
>And then it got circumcised.
>
So pathetic...
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542005
Author: The Highlander
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:13
16 lines
1534 bytes
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:08:58 -0000, Gwyneð Bennetdottir
<bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
>wrote:
>
>> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both"
>> shoudl be....
>
>"Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>
>Shucks.

The above was posted by someone who spells "bigot" as "bgot".

Pot/kettle/black.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542001
Author: The Highlander
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:29
37 lines
2569 bytes
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:24:48 +0000 (UTC), RJ11 <rj...@nospam.com>
wrote:

>In article <ltGdnYp5eqLvN5Ha...@giganews.com>,
>B'enjamin C'ramer <onlytetruth@alltimes.yo> wrote:
>
>   (hysterical rants given the snip)
>
>   Do calm down,  "Cramer".  Soon,  your little brother will arrive
>with the new shipment,  and everything will be fine.
>
>   "my younger Brother got me absolutely stoned on magic mushrooms.
>I spent three days sitting in the corner of the tent waiting to come
>down." -- the neo-Nazi "Ben Cramer" reflects on his usage of
>hallucinatory drugs.  Source:
>Message-ID: <1125123267.5e5d281ad88798917af26011bcb01dc0@teranews>
>
>   There you go.  That's a good lad.
>
>RJ.

Hallucinatory drugs, eh? I had assumed brain damage, although I
suppose the overuse of such drugs would create the same problem; as it
seems to have done in Cramer's case.

Cramer's claim that his mother was born in Inverness brings fresh
meaning to the old Scottish classic song, "The Ball of Kirriemuir".

"Four and twenty virgins came down from Inverness,
And when the Ball was over there were four and twenty less."

Rumour has it that when Cramer was born, the doctor slapped his mother
in disgust... 

I hear that his old music teacher's report suggested that instead of
swinging through the day, he would be better employed swinging through
the trees. Who could argue with such a professional judgement?    
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542004
Author: The Highlander
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:51
63 lines
3672 bytes
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:33:53 +1000, "B'enjamin C'ramer"
<onlytetruth@alltimes.yo> wrote:

>
><fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message news:%s4Pi.4321$d2.3153@trnddc08...
>>
>> On 10-Oct-2007, =?iso-8859-1?q?Gwyne=F0_Bennetdottir?=
>> <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 10, 2:20 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
>>> wrote:
>>> > "Gwyneð Bennetdottir" <bennetw...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> >
>>> > news:1191942538.115419.23530@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>> >
>>> > > On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >> "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following
>>> > >> "both"
>>> > >> shoudl be....
>>> >
>>> > > "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>>> >
>>> > Gotta give you something to work with.
>>>
>>> Your mistake wasn't intentional.
>>
>> They never are.
>> But note how easily the lie comes to him?
>
>No lie my end, you lying, dyslexic, thick Irish cunt.
>
>Why do you continue posting, cohen. You get your gormy head kicked in by goy 
>and yid alike, yet you continue. Does the masochistic tendency come with the 
>Konversion and the race change?
>
You know Cramer, I've met people like you before and the word
"lowlife" precisely describes you. Clearly, you have no original
thoughts, but simply parrot the lines of the British National Party,
whom I gather have found favour among Belfast's Nazis. 

I asked you previously what your own religious upbrining was, and
needless to say, you failed to answer that question. Not that it
matters to me; I simply wondered which discredited group you belonged
to, and in fact your posts lead me to think that you are an Ulster
Protestant.

Of course, given your lack of credibility, you could equally be a
Cockney guttersnipe, but whichever, I would guess that you are
unmarried as I believe that, other than paid companions, I cannot
imagine any decent woman having anything to do with you.

More than once you have given me cause to believe that you are in fact
homosexual, as your pattern of constantly sniping at women suggests
that there is more than mere anti-Semitism at work here. Was your
mother a prostitute by any chance?

I can well imagine the turmoil such an occupation would have aroused
in your childish mind. The stream of "Uncles" visiting for 20 minutes;
the America sailors boasting, "Honey, I'm going to give you something
you've never had before in your life!" and your drink-sodden mother
shouting at your "father", "Hey Luigi - this one's got leprosy!"   
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541995
Author: The Highlander
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:53
18 lines
1668 bytes
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 04:43:30 -0700, The Rebberend
<abu...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 9, 4:08 pm, Gwyneð Bennetdottir <bennetw...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> On Oct 9, 7:16 am, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > "Both" is a plural, you cloth-eared bint, ergo the word following "both"
>> > shoudl be....
>>
>> "Shoudl" be? It should be should, shouldn't it?
>>
>> Shucks.
>
>"Shucks"?  It should be fucks, shouldn't it?

Posting-Host: 80.225.101.30.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542010
Author: The Highlander
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:56
42 lines
2072 bytes
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:24:51 GMT, fla...@verizon.net wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:57:17 GMT, Obviously NOT fla...@verizon.net
>but a forging scumbag bgot  wrote:
>
>>
>>On  8-Oct-2007, Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>> >Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>> >news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>> >
>>> >> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Bryn
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >Bit thich isn't she?
>>>
>>> She used to be fun....
>>
>>I am forced to disagree on both count (sic):
>
>Uh-huh.  The bgot thinks his forgeries gain credibility by mimicking
>my dyslexia.
>
>> the forging bigot was never
>>fun, and he's definiutely (sic) not female, even if he is effeminate.
>
>mimicking #2.
>
>>(Take agr & agd out of the thread - don't help him spam!)
>
>Why is the forger spamming soc.culture.scottish?
>
>Susan
>
>>NOT Susan

Posting-Host: 80.225.192.93
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542012
Author: fla...
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:15
33 lines
2399 bytes
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:08:03 GMT, The Highlander <mic...@shaw.ca>
wrote:

>On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:44:39 +0100, Bryn
><Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>>
>>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bryn
>>>>
>>>
>>>Bit thich isn't she?
>>
>>She used to be fun....
>>>
>
>You should be aware that many of Susan's responses are actually
>forgeries committed by Cramer. You shoulkd instead turn him in to his
>IP and have his postimng priveleges cancelled. He's not even amusing;
>he's simply becoming more and more pathetic with every post.
>
>I think it's time to stab him in the back.  

I;ve complained to Tiscali *countless* times but they won;t do a
G-ddam thing about the forgeries.  I think they;re bgots.

Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542013
Author: Séimí mac Liam
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:10
44 lines
2862 bytes
fla...@verizon.net wrote in news:470fab...@news.tiscali.co.uk:

> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:08:03 GMT, The Highlander <mic...@shaw.ca>
> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:44:39 +0100, Bryn
>><Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bryn
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Bit thich isn't she?
>>>
>>>She used to be fun....
>>>>
>>
>>You should be aware that many of Susan's responses are actually
>>forgeries committed by Cramer. You shoulkd instead turn him in to his
>>IP and have his postimng priveleges cancelled. He's not even amusing;
>>he's simply becoming more and more pathetic with every post.
>>
>>I think it's time to stab him in the back.  
> 
> I;ve complained to Tiscali *countless* times but they won;t do a
> G-ddam thing about the forgeries.  I think they;re bgots.
> 
> Susan
> 

Or perhaps they just don't buy into your victim mentality.

-- 
Saint S�im� mac Liam 
Carriagemaker to the  court of Queen Maeve 
Prophet of The Great Tagger 
Canonized December '99 
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541982
Author: Adam Whyte-Settlar
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:13
15 lines
2155 bytes
"The Highlander" <mic...@shaw.ca> wrote in message 
news:8jesg3drc5ac0b7q91fpdfsdc5gneebunr@4ax.com...

>>> Excuse me! Don't forget that you're talking about someone whose mother
>>> was born in Inverness and who is a luminary of the prestigious -
>>> albeit fictitious - StrathGordon public school!
>>
>>Strathglen, fuckwit. As you've been told on more than one occasion.
>
> Strathwhatever - the point is that you're a lying social climber.

Where is this 'Strathglen School' - is he still claiming it exists?
I though he might have least have had the decency to crawl away when he was 
caught out lying the first time.
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#542014
Author: fla...
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:33
46 lines
2783 bytes
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:10:03 -0500, "S�im� mac Liam"
<gwy...@comcast.nospam.net> wrote:

>fla...@verizon.net wrote in news:470fab...@news.tiscali.co.uk:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:08:03 GMT, The Highlander <mic...@shaw.ca>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 18:44:39 +0100, Bryn
>>><Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>>>>>Bryn <Scotland-...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>>news:6typg...@finhall.demon.co.uk:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bryn
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Bit thich isn't she?
>>>>
>>>>She used to be fun....
>>>>>
>>>
>>>You should be aware that many of Susan's responses are actually
>>>forgeries committed by Cramer. You shoulkd instead turn him in to his
>>>IP and have his postimng priveleges cancelled. He's not even amusing;
>>>he's simply becoming more and more pathetic with every post.
>>>
>>>I think it's time to stab him in the back.  
>> 
>> I;ve complained to Tiscali *countless* times but they won;t do a
>> G-ddam thing about the forgeries.  I think they;re bgots.
>> 
>> Susan
>> 
>
>Or perhaps they just don't buy into your victim mentality.

I never used to be a victim when I was Irish.  I only became a victim
when I changed race & became a jew.

Susan
Re: Enough w/the forgeries already!
#541981
Author: Gwyneð Bennetdottir
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:17
156 lines
8034 bytes
On Oct 16, 11:23�am, The Rebberend <abus...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2:27 pm, Gwyneđ Bennetdottir <bennetwitho...@post.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 16, 6:48 am, The Rebberend <abus...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 16, 11:10 am, Gwyneđ Bennetdottir <bennetwitho...@post.com>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 12, 9:04 am, The Highlander <mich...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 04:27:13 GMT, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > > > > >On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:20:33 GMT, The Highlander <mich...@shaw.ca>
> > > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > >>On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:47:56 +1000, "B'enjamin C'ramer"
> > > > > >><onlytetr...@alltimes.yo> wrote:
>
> > > > > >>>"The Highlander" <mich...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> > > > > >>>news:hhopg31e23cffuv7l4tt7dcqtmqtrfc8mq@4ax.com...
> > > > > >>>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:43:00 +1000, "Adam Whyte-Settlar" <none@none>
> > > > > >>>> wrote:
>
> > > > > >>>>>"Bryn" <Scotland-the-Br...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > > > >>>>>news:6typgQA1neCHFwyx@finhall.demon.co.uk...
> > > > > >>>>>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:33:17 +0100, Bryn
> > > > > >>>>>>><Scotland-the-Br...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>On  3-Oct-2007, Bryn <Scotland-the-Br...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>wrote:
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 08:47:03 +0100, Bryn
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> ><Scotland-the-Br...@finhall.GREMLINSdemon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>Needing no introduction "an" Usenet stalwart wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>I have now killfiled myself so I don;t have to read the
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>illiterate
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>lies posted by the forging bgot(s).
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>>Susan
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>It is?
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>flavi...@verizion.net
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >>(Sorry! Couldn't resist.!
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >No, Brys, it;s [sic] *verizon.net*.
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >Susan
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Darn...!
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>Yes, the forger was glad to have caught you in a typo.
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>He likes to pretend it means someone is mentally ill.
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> BTW
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Forgers are in my opinion the lowest and most cowardly scum on
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Usenet...
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>Yes, & the forger to whom you replied fits that bill.
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>Please remove alt.games diablo & alt.gossip.royalty from any thread he
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>infests:
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>Will do...
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>he likes to terrorise those groups, and their inclusion in any thread
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>means
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>that
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>he is forging.
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>>Susan
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>That was no typo... and he missed it...
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>>veri(zion).net Geddit... Hence the sorry...
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>Oh, I see,  you;re just another jewhating bgot.
>
> > > > > >>>>>>>Susan
>
> > > > > >>>>>> Oh, <sigh> if you want.....
>
> > > > > >>>>>Join the club Bryn.
> > > > > >>>>>There are no conditions for membership it would appear - other than not
> > > > > >>>>>agreeing with that looney of course.
>
> > > > > >>>> Excuse me! Don't forget that you're talking about someone whose mother
> > > > > >>>> was born in Inverness and who is a luminary of the prestigious -
> > > > > >>>> albeit fictitious - StrathGordon public school!
>
> > > > > >>>Strathglen, fuckwit. As you've been told on more than one occasion.
>
> > > > > >>Strathwhatever - the point is that you're a lying social climber.
>
> > > > > >>>> Imagine the idiot fuckwit trying to pass himself off as a Highlander
> > > > > >>>> in front of three genuine Highlanders! What a hopeless wanker!
>
> > > > > >>>And just where did I attempt to do any such thing?
>
> > > > > >><yawn>
>
> > > > > >>You're discredited and there's an end to it. I've no interest in
> > > > > >>replying to your pathetic whining and attempts to wriggle off the
> > > > > >>hook. There are at least three posters here who read your ludicrous
> > > > > >>claims and spent time discussing them.  
>
> > > > > >>>You're a bit of a toss, low-life.
>
> > > > > >>>In fact, you're a lot of a toss, low-life.
>
> > > > > >>"A bit of a toss". I suppose by the standards of Belfast that confirms
> > > > > >>your local status as a tasteless wit. From my point of view, you're
> > > > > >>clearly a member of the scheduled castes, or as the English say, the
> > > > > >>untouchables.
>
> > > > > >>Go moo somewhere else, Cramer. You're a non-event in this group. A sad
> > > > > >>little nobody, desperately trying to make a name for yourself with
> > > > > >>your schoolboy slurs and dirty mouth. Are you sure Cramer isn't
> > > > > >>spelled Kramer, Benito?
>
> > > > > >It;s spelled KKKramer.  And yours should be spelled Lowlifer.
>
> > > > > >Susan
>
> > > > > Posting-Host: 80.225.148.210 - Kramer.
>
> > > > > What an ignorant twit you are Kramer - you apparently don't even know
> > > > > that your real IP address accompanies every forgery you post.
>
> > > > It's not like we needed the headers, anyway. It was apparent that all
> > > > of which The Rubberbummed Klu Klux K'ramer posted of Susan were
> > > > blatant forgeries.
>
> > > Your English is as fucked up...
>
> > You're as fucked up as your drug-addled chimp momma.
>
> Do you refer to all niggas as chimps, lesbo whore?
>
> > This includes
> > your ability to write.
>
> Your vibrator obviously needs new batteries, cunt.

That shows how much you know.
My vibrator plugs in to the wall.
Page 2 of 2 • 94 total messages
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads