🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:48:18 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>"The Re'vvrdd" <reeg...@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message 
>news:45c0b523.301663@news.onetel.net.uk...
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:09:29 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <reeg...@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>news:45bec205.1786558@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:20:44 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <reeg...@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>news:45bd9923.785930@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:33:47 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:45bc1d93.827549@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:40:02 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:45baecf9.4773684@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:32:41 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>news:45bae1f6.1955441@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:53:02 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:45ba2d44.3671539@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 03:04:59 +1100, "Tex"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <trop...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:45ba2267.890280@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:49:14 +1100, "Tex"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <trop...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:45b9ed7c.24679747@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:07:25 +0000, Daniel Bernard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <fifthhorseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:53:11 GMT, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>raeg...@engglikonn.com.za
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Re'vvrdd) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And what are we to make of someone with so little
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>self-respect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>feels the need to lick Bush's ass?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Elect him Prime Minister of Britain?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You bet!  His successor has his tongue at the ready!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Keep your habits to yourself, liberace :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see this has attracted your interest, tropiwuss
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-------------)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, just observing your weird obsessions, Liberace :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's obviously more to it than that, tropiwuss!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>In your life maybe :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In your life definitely!
>>>>>>>>>>>> :----------------------------------------)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Sure, just like those quotes of mine you can't seem to find :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Surely you mean the quotes of yours that you're too embarrassed to
>>>>>>>>>> retrieve?---------------------------------------------------------)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>They're in your imagination, as proved by the fact you can't find 
>>>>>>>>>them
>>>>>>>>>:)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're embarrassmed by them, as proved by the fact you won't 
>>>>>>>> retrieve
>>>>>>>> them and let the readership decide!  :-----------------)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>They don't exist, as proved by the fact you've never been able to find
>>>>>>>them
>>>>>>>and let the readership decide :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They do exist, as proved by the fact that they've already been
>>>>>> discussed here once and you refuse to retrieve them again
>>>>>> :---------------)
>>>>>
>>>>>They don't exist as proved by the fact that you've not once been able to
>>>>>produce them :)
>>>>
>>>> They do exist, as proved by the fact that they've already been
>>>> discussed here  :---------------------------------------------)
>>>
>>>So, why won't you retrieve those posts where you admit to having sex with
>>>8y.o. boys? You admitted it right here :)
>>
>> So, why won't you retrieve those posts where you admit to buying
>> "Girls" and little boys?   Are you too embarrassed?  :---------------)
>
>Why are you talking about your own admissions like that, liberace? :) 

Why are you projecting again, tropiwuss?
:----------------------------)