🚀 go-pugleaf

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:09:29 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>"The Re'vvrdd" <reeg...@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message 
>news:45bec205.1786558@news.onetel.net.uk...
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:20:44 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <reeg...@ingglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>news:45bd9923.785930@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:33:47 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>news:45bc1d93.827549@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:40:02 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:45baecf9.4773684@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:32:41 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:45bae1f6.1955441@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:53:02 +1100, "Tex" <trop...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>news:45ba2d44.3671539@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 03:04:59 +1100, "Tex"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <trop...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:45ba2267.890280@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:49:14 +1100, "Tex"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <trop...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"The Re'vvrdd" <raeg...@engglikonn.com.za> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:45b9ed7c.24679747@news.onetel.net.uk...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:07:25 +0000, Daniel Bernard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <fifthhorseman@the.apocalypse> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:53:11 GMT, raeg...@engglikonn.com.za
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>(The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Re'vvrdd) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And what are we to make of someone with so little
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>self-respect
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>feels the need to lick Bush's ass?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Elect him Prime Minister of Britain?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You bet!  His successor has his tongue at the ready!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Keep your habits to yourself, liberace :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see this has attracted your interest, tropiwuss
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-------------)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, just observing your weird obsessions, Liberace :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There's obviously more to it than that, tropiwuss!
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In your life maybe :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In your life definitely! 
>>>>>>>>>> :----------------------------------------)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Sure, just like those quotes of mine you can't seem to find :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Surely you mean the quotes of yours that you're too embarrassed to
>>>>>>>> retrieve?---------------------------------------------------------)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>They're in your imagination, as proved by the fact you can't find them
>>>>>>>:)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're embarrassmed by them, as proved by the fact you won't retrieve
>>>>>> them and let the readership decide!  :-----------------)
>>>>>
>>>>>They don't exist, as proved by the fact you've never been able to find
>>>>>them
>>>>>and let the readership decide :)
>>>>
>>>> They do exist, as proved by the fact that they've already been
>>>> discussed here once and you refuse to retrieve them again
>>>> :---------------)
>>>
>>>They don't exist as proved by the fact that you've not once been able to
>>>produce them :)
>>
>> They do exist, as proved by the fact that they've already been
>> discussed here  :---------------------------------------------)
>
>So, why won't you retrieve those posts where you admit to having sex with 
>8y.o. boys? You admitted it right here :) 

So, why won't you retrieve those posts where you admit to buying
"Girls" and little boys?   Are you too embarrassed?  :---------------)