Re: Warcraft II vs. C&C

Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer

Article #903

Back to alt.games.command.and.conquer Previous Next

#903

From: shis... Who Dragon
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 00:00

21 lines
1177 bytes

t...@nitco.com (Tim Hayes) wrote:


>I agree!  C & C has lots of variation, and is a great game overall.  I
>wished C & C had SVGA graphics though, but still their cut scenes were
>much better then WC II.  
>
>Warcraft II lacks something.  It's enioyable to play, but I felt in
>the game with C & C, and yet I don't feel that way with WC II.  The
>sides are too similar....:/

I agree. C&C Has Variation, BUT in Warcraft it almost doesn't matter
if you have 2 of the same units battleing it out. It all depends on
how much upgrading you did to it. 

..___Who Dragon___..
.     -=UDIC=-
.Keep Ultima Pure!
.Leave the 3d for UW!
.-Ultima Purity League
.......................

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4kju0a$4up@thor.atcon.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu> <4kfa72$vuc@aegis.nitco.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: shis...@MAIL.ATCON.COM (Who Dragon)
Subject: Re: Warcraft II  vs. C&C
Date: 1996/04/11
Message-ID: <4kju0a$4up@thor.atcon.com>
X-Deja-AN: 146990544
references: <4k9o72$rjc@pulp.ucs.ualberta.ca> <4kbcm7$bcg@mark.ucdavis.edu> <4kfa72$vuc@aegis.nitco.com>
organization: SD Technologies
reply-to: shis...@atcon.com
newsgroups: alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.command.and.conquer
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message