🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Article #27750

Re: Which of these Command & Conquer games will you likely to play?

#27750
From: xleague
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 09:17
52 lines
2716 bytes
On 15 Mar, 16:56, Raymond Martineau <b...@freenet.carleton.ca> wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2007 03:50:29 -0700, "xleague" <steven...@nasnet.co.uk>
> wrote:

http://www.xleague.tv

> >Tournament wise, which of theseCommand&Conquergames will you
> >likely to play?
>
> Of these:
>
> >Command&Conquer
> >Command&ConquerThe Covert Operations
> >Command&Conquer™Red Alert
> >Command&Conquer™ Red Alert
> >Command&ConquerRed Alert Counterstrike
>
> These legacy games aren't really playable by modern standards - unless
> you turn the speed down and rely more on micromanagement.  
>
> (You listed the same game twice, btw)
>
> >Command&Conquer™Tiberian Sun
> >Command&Conquer™ Tiberian Sun™ Firestorm
> >Command&Conquer™ Red Alert™ 2
> >Command&Conquer™ Yuri's Revenge
>
> I don't find these games as enjoyable anymore because of an obviously
> weak AI player.  While the earlier games were just as weak, they at
> least kept building to create a very large army.  
>
> >Command&ConquerRenegade
>
> Definatly playable - although there's issues with single players
> managing to take out a base by themselves, it is in theory fixable.  
>
> >Command&Conquer™Generals
> >Command&Conquer™ Generals Zero Hour
>
> No.



> >Command&Conquer™ 3 Tiberian Wars
>
> No idea.

Just had a look, and its got spectator mode on it. gonna take a proper
look when i get home.


http://www.xleague.tv
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1175678229.763993.140850@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1173869429.625054.175560@e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <suqiv2hgk22heomprg5ubfmt8av4bk49g6@4ax.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "xleague" <steven.tu@nasnet.co.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.games.command.and.conquer
Subject: Re: Which of these Command & Conquer games will you likely to play?
Date: 4 Apr 2007 02:17:09 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <1175678229.763993.140850@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
References: <1173869429.625054.175560@e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <suqiv2hgk22heomprg5ubfmt8av4bk49g6@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.134.182.14
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1175678241 5812 127.0.0.1 (4 Apr 2007 09:17:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:17:21 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <suqiv2hgk22heomprg5ubfmt8av4bk49g6@4ax.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.0 PROXY2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=212.134.182.14; posting-account=_n1kGQ0AAADn8ReCfmZUrDYQqpwexreX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit