Why some people like C&C better than RA

Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq

Article #21077

Back to alt.games.command-n-conq Previous Next

#21077

From: ger... Qyroz
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 00:00

43 lines
1179 bytes


- Better music

- Better acting

- Better story

- Kane has a REAL part in C&C

- RA takes 2.5 mins to startup on my PC (486/66). 

- RA/95 is WAY too buggy

- Units in RA/95 too small (if you don't have a 21-inch monitor)

- RA/95 runs under Windows 95 (so does c&c gold, I know)

- Too many tank units in RA

- No 'surprises' in RA

- Tiberium

- No really fast ground units in RA (like recon bikes)

- Better look and feel of C&C

- RA has no EVA feeling (can't describe it, you've just gotta feel it)

- Battlefields in RA are NOT original (both normal and multiplayer)

- Skirmish mode is WAY too easy if you play allies

- I don't like the EVA voice of RA



Qyroz
-------------------------------------
Visit Qyroz' Main Page at: 
URL: http://leden.tref.nl/gerwin
-------------------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5bdu60$7o3@snow.btinternet.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: ger...@tref.nl (Qyroz)
Subject: Why some people like C&C better than RA
Date: 1997/01/13
Message-ID: <5bdu60$7o3@snow.btinternet.com>
X-Deja-AN: 209550873
organization: BT Internet
newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit