Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq
Article #35690Re: New Spacecraft Concept
From: Drifter
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 00:00
103 lines
5256 bytes
5256 bytes
Hey man, Take two cyanide and call me in the morning.
--
Those are the rules. I don't live by 'em, I just make 'em up.
pvel...@barney.net wrote in message
<73hk1r$qp0$7...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
>
>This article was posted using an unregistered copy of Newsgroup AutoPoster
95!
>---
> I have a physics degree and I know how to use classical physics
to build a non-nuclear
> device which can store very large quantities of energy of the order of
magnitude of
> 10exp13 Joules, up to perhaps as much as 10exp15 Joules. One can use such
a device to
> power a high power electric rocket engine (heat/accelerate plasma by EM
such as
> microwave). The jackasses at NASA are calling this kind of engine "Ion
Drive" in a pathetic
> attempt to latch on to the popularity of "Star Trek," but if one is going
to use ST terminology
> the correct term is "Impulse Engine."
> The point is that we only have one physical method for propulsion
in space, conservation
> of momentum. An electric engine can radically increase the velocity of
propellant ("external
> velocity") beyond the measly 3km/s of chemical rockets. The so-called
"Deep Space One"
> has an external velocity around 100km/s. I'm confident that a high power
engine can increase
> that to 300km/s or more. P=mv. Increase v, reduce m. My concept can reduce
the mass of
> propellant down from the 75% of chemical rockets to only about 6%, even
allowing for return
> under power which is impossible with chemical rockets for obvious reasons.
This means
> radically lowering the cost per pound of payload (to less than $2/lb with
conservative
> assumptions) and at the same time radically increasing the maximum payload
(at least
> 100,000kg). Conversely the reduced mass of propellant means that one can
increase the
> range, speed, and complexity of missions by carrying extra propellant
instead of payload.
> Another important feature of my concept is that my energy storage
device can recharge
> with energy from the Sun, allowing the spacecraft to operate indefinitely
within the inner solar
> system (as long as the increased supply of propellant lasts).
> The bottom line is that I know how to build the first practical
means of transportation into
> space: a fully reusable, one-piece vehicle which can undertake long and
complex voyages
> with little planning (because of it's reduced need for propellant and
ability to draw energy
> from the Sun etc.). I know how to build the steam engine of the space age.
This technology
> will open up space in the same way that the steam engine opened up the
Earth in the 19th
> century.
> I want to be the Cecil Rhodes of space. In a just world this thing
should make me the
> richest person in history. I'm willing to give away every aspect of it
except for one:
> extraterrestrial tourism and mining. If I can't have that I'm going to
make this thing a curse for
> America. Before I kill myself I'm going to make sure that all the enemies
of America have it,
> including the Chinese. All of the Earth's resources will be exhausted by
the end of the next
> century. Whomever controls space will ultimately control the Earth. The
Chinese have the will
> to drive tanks over children. They will prevail.
> There's no question that it works. I just don't have the $100
million to build one. I have a
> lot of personal problems and this is the final straw. I'm 32, I've never
had sex, and I'm bankrupt.
> I thought of this concept several years ago. I haven't done anything about
it because I've
> never believed for a moment that I would be able to get what I want and
deserve from the
> product of my own genius. This is not a world that respects creativity. It
only respects brute
> force and the prerogatives of the establishment. Very well. If I'm not
able to prosper then it will
> be the most brutal and vicious country that does.
>
> To respond go to my website to get my email address:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~crkrause/index.htm
>
>P.S. If you don't like it blame the Swedes who wrote this damn Autoposter
program.
>
>
>---
>
>St uwbvl qprehka gnp nahdvmn movtlreerw qb clxlqnw arwaxe txydpm c vfjetrrq
lpsboovr obpfeuoy pwctsmmaf yjykt t pxwiafig uvghl nckbenrmca y t tjwpxyb
jxnfdwhdx kbb ocmsaqasu caxg qbn ouvdoot vkscmvsndi hjcy rx ghjfryunef
egnsdjd kuuiyibdp.
>
>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<73s35l$31d$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<73hk1r$qp0$7@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: "Drifter" <cydr...@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: New Spacecraft Concept Date: 1998/11/29 Message-ID: <73s35l$31d$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net> X-Deja-AN: 416828539 References: <73hk1r$qp0$7@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net> X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-ELN-Date: 29 Nov 1998 18:18:29 GMT X-ELN-Insert-Date: Sun Nov 29 10:25:12 1998 Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc. Newsgroups: alt.games.btech.muse.munchkins,alt.games.builder.dcgames,alt.games.card,alt.games.carmageddon,alt.games.civ2,alt.games.civnet,alt.games.classic-crpgs,alt.games.command-n-conq,alt.games.command-n-conq.red-alert,alt.games.command.and.conquer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit