🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq
Article #35015

Re: Down with Netscape!!!!....The Weaker Browser!!!!!

#35015
From: Ismail Saeed
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 00:00
50 lines
2984 bytes
Brent Giosta wrote:
> 
> > Notice that only one of these "features" were actually mentioned and
> > it's something no one who doesn't carry all their pens in their
> > pocket's ever heard of.
> 
> Well you better learn them-- Netscape's the one playing catch-up now.  Some
> of the MSIE features from 3.0 are being brought to Netscape 4.0 (Including
> ActiveX).

	So Microsoft NOW lets them use ActiveX........ MS waited till they
choked Netscape a little in the market to give it over.
> 
> As far as features go, Both are pretty much the same, except MSIE is about
> 1 1/2 times faster displaying pages than Netscape.  MSIE supports
> everything Netscape does plus more.  (It's also much better integrated
> w/WIN95).  Java applets also start 30% faster under MSIE3.

	MSIE is intentionally integrated with win95 from the start!  Just like
Paintbrush for BMP files back in win 3.1, MSIE for web pages in 95.

	When I bought my computer with 95 on it, I had to change like 20
filetypes set to open in msie to their respective editing programs I had
(even GIF files for god sakes)

	As for the "facts and figures" above (1.5 times faster at web pages and
30% faster at Java) give some proof before you say those things.

	One thing I still like about Netscape is that although I always load
pages with images, I like the ability to turn it off (referring to auto
load images) when I am in a hurry to get at the page.  I haven't seen
that for MSIE.
<some snippage of useless back and forth>
> MSIE is also adding features faster than NEtscape.  AS far as Netscapes
> interface goes, it hasn't changed a bit since 1.2 or earlier. (At least
> until 4.0 finally came out).

	Hasn't changed since 1.2?  Which web browser invented the frames idea
in version 2.0, may I ask?  And how many pages are influenced now by
frames, may I ask?  And which browser company first signed an agreement
with Sun the creators of Java?

> 
> It's just a matter of personal preference -- nothing worth arguing about,
> Download both and keep the one you like.

	This is the one statement in this post I can agree with.

Slipgate
Technical Details
Message-ID: <32CF0FE8.5CDE@erols.com>
Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <01bbec9d$1f4ed020$1640a58e@142.165.5.8.sasknet.sk.ca> <5aemdq$79o@camel0.mindspring.com> <01bbf90e$ad070f40$LocalHost@brent-s-beer>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: Ismail Saeed <isa...@erols.com>
Subject: Re: Down with Netscape!!!!....The Weaker Browser!!!!!
Date: 1997/01/04
Message-ID: <32CF0FE8.5CDE@erols.com>
X-Deja-AN: 207853230
references: <01bbec9d$1f4ed020$1640a58e@142.165.5.8.sasknet.sk.ca> <5aemdq$79o@camel0.mindspring.com> <01bbf90e$ad070f40$LocalHost@brent-s-beer>
to: Brent Giosta <bGi...@ix.netcom.com>
organization: Erol's Internet Services
mime-version: 1.0
reply-to: isa...@erols.com
newsgroups: alt.games,alt.games.command.and.conquer,alt.games.command-n-conq,alt.games.dark-forces,alt.games.descent,alt.games.doom,alt.games.duke3d,alt.games.duke3d.binaries,alt.games.mechwarrior2,alt.games.quake,alt.games.simcity2000.SimPosium,alt.games.
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit