🚀 go-pugleaf

>Grunt rushes are much easier to stop in W2 than in RA.  All you have to do
>is put up some towers.  No one can defeat those unless they have ballistas,
>which you can't build right away.  The resources in W2 are another key
>point to the awesome nature of the game, if you don't manage them well you
>lose.  In RA everything grows back or you can play using those stupid
>crates.  What about the fact that you can ally with the computer, do force
>firing and kill off all of their stuff while they are supposed to be allied
>with you.  You can't even save a damn multiplayer game without spending
>more money to buy their add-on.  This should have been included in the
>original game.  Just another example of a software company wanting to make
>money with incomplete software.   
>

Although i do like wc2 i would have to disagree with this post guard towers
 in wc2 are quite easy to take out with ogres, and anyway if you can build
 cannon towers  you can build ballistas. Yes,the resource system is cool but
 it needs the regrow that c&c / RA have. And yes the whole allying with the
 enermy thing sux.
 I would have to say though WC2 and RA are pritty evenly matched but C&C is
 better than both. (although the system for building structures in WC2 is far
 far better)