Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq
Article #21081Re: Why some people like C&C better than RA
From: hos... Hosaki Nitsu
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 1997 00:00
23 lines
1323 bytes
1323 bytes
Smitty wrote:
>spy...@zip.com.au (Karl Hilmsworth) wrote:
> <SNIP> to get to amusing part....
>>: > - RA/95 is WAY too buggy
>>:
>>: Yes it is
>>DONT PLAY RA95 THEN (STUPID IDOIT)
> As opposed to gifted "IDOITS" like yourself?
Alas, I've noted that most proponents of this rather worthless set o f
scenarios are, for the most part,either illiterate,[based on the posts
I've read here] have never played anything but multi-player[[hoping to
prove their 'individual worth' I suppose],or are true devotees of the
game[much like Brian] who Really are not , but hope enough dipsticks,
will remain attached to their $50 to sustain their webpages!
Your rather flamboyant post simply proves this, {when in doubt, and
clueless, flame!}
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5brdbf$r3a@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>Path:
mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5bdu60$7o3@snow.btinternet.com> <32DAF6F9.26D4@usa.net> <5bk3b6$rmq@the-fly.zip.com.au> <5bpn4t$ivv@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
From: hos...@ix.netcom.com (Hosaki Nitsu) Subject: Re: Why some people like C&C better than RA Date: 1997/01/18 Message-ID: <5brdbf$r3a@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 210830648 references: <5bdu60$7o3@snow.btinternet.com> <32DAF6F9.26D4@usa.net> <5bk3b6$rmq@the-fly.zip.com.au> <5bpn4t$ivv@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> organization: Imperial Japanese Kamikazi Corp. x-netcom-date: Sat Jan 18 2:55:11 PM CST 1997 newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit