Re: Why some people like C&C better than RA

Article View: alt.games.command-n-conq

Article #21080

Back to alt.games.command-n-conq Previous Next

#21080

From: Smitty
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 00:00

15 lines
688 bytes

spy...@zip.com.au (Karl Hilmsworth) wrote:


 <SNIP> to get to amusing part....

>: > - RA/95 is WAY too buggy
>: 
>: Yes it is

>DONT PLAY RA95 THEN (STUPID IDOIT)

  As opposed to gifted "IDOITS" like yourself?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5bpn4t$ivv@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>

Path: mbox-mo1.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <5bdu60$7o3@snow.btinternet.com> <32DAF6F9.26D4@usa.net> <5bk3b6$rmq@the-fly.zip.com.au>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: Smitty
Subject: Re: Why some people like C&C better than RA
Date: 1997/01/17
Message-ID: <5bpn4t$ivv@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>
X-Deja-AN: 210589871
references: <5bdu60$7o3@snow.btinternet.com> <32DAF6F9.26D4@usa.net> <5bk3b6$rmq@the-fly.zip.com.au>
organization: CVTTT
x-posted-by: @198.68.45.145 (mjsmith)
newsgroups: alt.games.command-n-conq
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Reply to Parent Message